- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: c3000 enclosure
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2010 11:06 AM
тАО03-21-2010 11:06 AM
Just wondering if it is possible to have following configuration on c3000 enclosure interconnect bays?
bay 1 ethernet passhtru
bay 2 ethernet passthru
bay 3 4gb fc passthru
bay 4 4gb fc passhtru
When I try to configure c3000 with bl460c g6 and 2 4gb glogic cards I get errors that it is incompatible. What would be the best way to ensure redundand fc interconnect bays and redundant ethernet interconnect bays on c3000 enclosure?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2010 04:41 PM
тАО03-21-2010 04:41 PM
Re: c3000 enclosure
In order to get ethernet redundancy you will need to put an Ethernet card on Mess Bay 1.
Note: If you check the port mapping diagram for the C3000.
1) All LOM NIC's map to IC bay 1
2) Mezz slot 1 maps all ports to IC Bay 2
With Ethernet NIC card on Mezz 1 you have redundancy for Ethernet. You can set up NIC teams between LOM ports and Mezz 1.
3) If you place a 2 port HBA on Mezz slot 2, then Port 1 maps to IC bay 3, and Port 2 maps to IC bay 4.
This gives you redundancy for your FC, (although the HBA is a single point of failure.)
Hope this helps.
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-21-2010 10:22 PM
тАО03-21-2010 10:22 PM
Re: c3000 enclosure
check the attachment you will see what can be done with your blade enclosure, and you can see the difference between your c3000 and c7000.
mikap
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 12:00 AM
тАО03-22-2010 12:00 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 12:39 AM
тАО03-22-2010 12:39 AM
SolutionRoughly said:
They cut the C7000 down the middle.
C7000 vs C3000
Interconnect bay 1 = Bay 1
Interconnect bay 2 = na
Interconnect bay 3 = Bay 2
Interconnect bay 4 = na
Interconnect bay 5 = Bay 3
Interconnect bay 6 = na
Interconnect bay 7 = Bay 4
Interconnect bay 8 = na
So you can put a 2 port nic in mezz 1, to have a ethernet passthrough in interconnect bay 2.
I just need to re-check the the port mapping on ICB 3 and 4.
BR
/jag
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 12:49 AM
тАО03-22-2010 12:49 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01508406/c01508406.pdf#19
It say the same as mikap's attachment
BR
/jag
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 01:15 AM
тАО03-22-2010 01:15 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
So I am not able to do the same thing as on c7000 enclosure where on half height blade I am able to map it like I mentioned in my first post?
of course not, because c3000 is not designed for enterprise solutions, i would prefer more normal single servers solution instead of blade c3000, but this is just my personal opinion, so please don't be hesitate form my answer.
mikap
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 01:21 AM
тАО03-22-2010 01:21 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 01:28 AM
тАО03-22-2010 01:28 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
>Mikap.
Yes there's pros and cons to blades.
I love the blades.
BR
/jag
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2010 01:33 AM
тАО03-22-2010 01:33 AM
Re: c3000 enclosure
yes, of course as you mentioned the blade have pros / cons, its depends, what the customer required for solution.
mikap