- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-13-2010 06:47 AM
тАО05-13-2010 06:47 AM
VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
Whilst I've been using VC modules for quite some time now (VC-Enet 1/10's and Flex-10's) and find them very good pieces of equipment, I still feel that performing a firmware upgrade can be a bit hit-and-miss.
Certainly we've had problems caused by bad config (uplinks spanning vc's in the early installs, poor cluster heartbeat setups etc), but even recently on a update we seem to experience firstly a failure in the auto update process (it went through the motions, but the revision was not updated) and then on the retry it taking both vc's in bays 1 and 2 down for a short period (causing VM hosts to think they'd lost cluster members & restarting vm's).
I'm curious to hear of others experiences & and nuggets of info you may have. From what I read HP say it should be possible to update the modules without outages and I can see that it should work, and I really want to a place when I can consider performing updates without having to schedule large outages.
Additionally, does stacking enclosures and staggering uplinks across enclosures provide additional benefits during firmware updates?
Regards,
Julian.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-13-2010 07:15 AM
тАО05-13-2010 07:15 AM
Re: VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
I determined that most of the upgrade issues with FC modules are related to firewalls and Anti-Virus software.
One thing to note. The failover of the VC manager between modules takes ~25-30 seconds.
This is normally more than cluster heartbeats can handle. It is important to have your heartbeats using a pair of teamed NIC's (which of course, failover virtually immediately).
If you have your heartbeats and Network connectivity properly configured for failover, then there is no reason why your servers should be affected during upgrade (that I am aware of).
Having said that, at my site we do not perform VC upgrades during uptime, we always schedule a PM window. (primarily because my cluster communications is not on a teamed pair (at the moment))
HTH
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-13-2010 07:22 AM
тАО05-13-2010 07:22 AM
Re: VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
Thanks Dave.
On the subject of teamed heartbeats for clusters (Microsoft Win2003 in this case), I read that the best practice is to not team the heartbeat interfaces. I've certainly had trouble in the past with these teamed and have since found that if you have a 'heartbeat A' and a 'heartbeat B' nic using different IP ranges this works better.
I need to look further at timeout values to make things a bit more tolerant to the failovers, hopefully this will help.
Julian.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-13-2010 09:04 AM
тАО05-13-2010 09:04 AM
Re: VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
I would recommend using VCSU instead of the GUI. VCSU can run a non-intrusive healthcheck on your VC domain prior to performing an update.
If you have a fault-tolerant setup adding an activation delay of a minute or two to give the module that is getting activated a little more time to come back up before the next module is activated...
DELAY = OPTIONAL. Delay in minutes between activations of bays
-we = VC-Enet Delay
-wf = VC-FC Delay
Default is 0 or no delay. Maximum is 60 minutes
in case you aren't familiar with VCSU:
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&prodTypeId=3709945&prodSeriesId=3794423&prodNameId=3794431&swEnvOID=1005&swLang=13&mode=2&taskId=135&swItem=MTX-15cda0bebbbc4d8c861a7898f7
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-24-2010 05:09 AM
тАО05-24-2010 05:09 AM
Re: VC Firmware Upgrades - What's Your Experience?
As a rule the updates we've run have all gone ok first time. Occasionally one module will fail to update but you can usually get around this by resetting/reseating the offending module or simply re-running the update tool. There are a number of threads in this section which describe these issues and how they can be resolved.
As far as any outages go we haven't had any problems yet. Servers have resilient configs and handle individual port disconnections. Then again, it's more likely to be OS/application issues that trip you up.
That said, I'd always run updates at quiet times on business critical servers.