- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- VCFlexFabric Shared Uplink Set ( LAG ) to an Junip...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2012 09:36 AM
03-15-2012 09:36 AM
Hi,
Does anyone have some experience or info on "gotchas" or similar on how to setup a SUS from Flexfabric to Juniper EX4500 Virtual Chassis ?
I know it maybe a too generic question, but we have setup a LAG on the EX4500 and have trunked it with a lot of VLANS and also have setup them on the SUS in VC but of course it does not seem to work right now. I will investigate further but just wanted to do a quick poll with you out there if there is something you know right now...
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-15-2012 10:03 AM
03-15-2012 10:03 AM
SolutionI'm not aware of any gotchas with EX Virtual Chassis.
I had customers using VC to Juniper EX and they work fine. For VC, we really don't care if EX is running virtual chassis or not. The only thing VC really cares is LACP if you want to do port bundling and I'm pretty sure Virtual Chassis will send LACP like from one "virtual" switch and that'll keep VC happy.
The best doc you should look at is the ones I wrote to connect VC to HPN IRF or Cisco vPC. Both of them trying to achieve the same thing as Virtual chassis. The beneficial part of doc for you is how to design and connect cables from VC side and how VC config will look like. You'll find both of these docs pointers in my blog. Currently it's the first post in the blog.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2012 05:32 PM - edited 03-16-2012 05:38 PM
03-16-2012 05:32 PM - edited 03-16-2012 05:38 PM
Re: VCFlexFabric Shared Uplink Set ( LAG ) to an Juniper EX4500 Virtual Chassi ?
Woow...Thank you for your amazing quick answer...did not expect that !
Yes, it is working now. We just did forget to disable STP on the LACP LAG group. As soon as we disabled it started to work. I'm glad for that but I really do not understand why STP affects the LAG since VC as I know blocks all BPDU traffic from switches anyway ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2012 05:39 PM
03-16-2012 05:39 PM
Re: VCFlexFabric Shared Uplink Set ( LAG ) to an Juniper EX4500 Virtual Chassi ?
good to know. it's weird that STP can affect that. VC will drop any IEEE BPDU and if it's Cisco PVST BPDU, it'll pass to server like regular frames.
I know for cisco switch, you don't have to disable STP on port channel, VC can form LACP bundle without problems. many customers do this way.
but anyway, best practice to connect with VC is to do STP edge and BPDU guard on switch side. Just treat VC as "big" server NIC ports.