- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Virtual Connect flexlom reordering of vmnics
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2018 05:31 PM
02-01-2018 05:31 PM
Virtual Connect flexlom reordering of vmnics
Hello community.
I have a VMware ESXi cluster running on multipl e vlade servers. These are all configured similarly.
lom1:a and lom2:a vm network
lom1:c and lom2:c mgmt/vmotion
lom1:d and lom2:d iscsi
lom1:b and lom2:b Assigned to FCoE , however we will repurpose these into another shared uplink set and this will configure similar to lom1:a and lom2:a
My concern is that once I power down the blades and remove the definition for lom1:b and lom2:b the vmnics presented to the ESXi hosts may becone reordered and jack the configuration. For example lom1:b and lom2:b may be assigned to the mgmt/vmotion network where lom1:c and lom2:c currently are. This concern was raised because on a test blade when I unhide the unused flexnics I get the warning in the screen shot about possible reordering.
Can anyone confirm. If I am not clear I can elaborate. I did not setup the FCoE unused definition so stating that this was a bad practice is not lost on me.. but will not hep me at this time,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-03-2018 04:18 PM
02-03-2018 04:18 PM
Re: Virtual Connect flexlom reordering of vmnics
Seems I am approaching this wrong. Rather than create a new shared uplink set for uplink port x5, I am going to simply add uplink port 5 to the shared uplink set. SUS are defined on FlexFabric 10/24 to be clear.
In an Active/Active Shared uplink set configuration is this supported? Specifically do all the uplink ports in each shared uplink set need to carry the same VLAN IDs? Or can I split them. See below for an explanation.
We are using Active/Active SUS, so we have 1 shared uplink set (SUS) per bay consisting only of uplink port X4 on the respective interconnect..
Currently SUSA=Bay1::PortX4, want to make this SUSA=Bay1::PortX4andPortX5
Currently SUSB=Bay2::PortX4, want to make this SUSB=Bay2::PortX4andPortX5
Currently PortX4 on SUSA and SUSB are connected to trunked ports passing multiple VLANs. What we are going to do is to add Portx5 to SUSA and SUSB respectively. We will then remove 2 of the VLAN definitions from the switch ports connected to PortsX4 and define them on switch ports connected to PortsX5.
So the end result is
SUSA::Bay1::PortsX4andX5
SUSA::PortX4 = VLANID 1 through VLANID 8
SUSA::PortX5 = VLANID 9 and 10
SUSB::Bay2::PortsX4andX5
SUSB::PortX4 = VLANID 1 through VLANID 8
SUSB::PortX5 = VLANID 9 and 10
I am aware thsat you can have multple uplink ports in a shared uplink set however, In an Active/Active Shared uplink set configuration, do all the uplink ports in each shared uplink set need to carry the same VLAN IDs? Or can I split them like I have defined above where PortX4 carries 1-8 and PortX5 carries 9-10?