- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- When to use shared uplinks for LAG vs ethernet LAG...
BladeSystem - General
1753854
Members
7987
Online
108808
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-05-2009 12:50 PM
10-05-2009 12:50 PM
When to use shared uplinks for LAG vs ethernet LAG?
I have some confusion as to when creating "shared uplink" sets is appropriate vs just using multiple flex uplinks in the ethernet networks configuration of the flex-10 GUI. I've been through the cookbook a few times and still aren't sure when you should or should not use them and why. Let me give you a scenario: C7000 chassis with two Flex-10s in bay 1and 2. Out of each flex 10 we are using x2-x6 uplinks at 1Gb. So, bay1 goes to cisco 6500 switch P and bay2 goes to cisco 6500 switch S. The switches are not using cisco's virtual switch so each switch has to have its own LAG to the flex 10 (IE, I can't create an LACP LAG between th e two switches back to the flex). Now, I know there is some unresolvable bug where you can't have a LAG over 40Gb or it fails on the Flex-10 (according to the 2.10 and 2.12 release notes). We are using Oracle VM (yes we got it working on BL460G6s by rolling our own nic driver, PITA). Now, we would want the hypervisors to do their own VLAN Tagging manipulation, but we want the flexibility to pass down the native tags from the cisco w/o manipulation OR to use them if a blade needs to be baremetal. So, blade1 might have a full 10Gb 802.1q link but blade 2 I might need to only give it vlan120 (for example). At the moment we are using Active/passive failover nic bonding and would want to continue to do the same on the blades (thus 10Gb to flex10 to switch P, failover 10gb to flex 10 in bay 2 to switch S). I understand there are ways to allow the flex-10 to do the failover so we don't need to do bonding at all on the host OS side but there is some mention about that not being the best design in having traffic flow over the internal 10Gb link between flex modules, no mention of what happens when a flex module really goes south if the hosts are going to start using the other flex for their uplink. My apologies for the long winded example, but I figure it best to give too much information than not enough. This is similar to scenario #14, host based vlans, 801.1q and 802.3ad, but using both mapped and unmapped vlans and confused about "shared uplink set"
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP