- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Backup performance
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-19-2007 09:47 PM
тАО10-19-2007 09:47 PM
Backup performance
i have an L3000 Server with 4 CPU/750Mhz. and 16GigRam. The Server is connected by 2 Fiber-Cards/2GB to an CX500 with 16 Luns. At the end there are approx. 70 Disks.
I use JFS. On the Server is Oracle installed. The backup speed (DataProtector, LTO1 ) is normally good, but if I stop the database and start an normall filesystem backup the tape drive starts and stops all the time.
For me it looks that the disks are slow. I checked it by Glance and the disk i/o is really bad.
Best regards
Stefan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-20-2007 09:37 AM
тАО10-20-2007 09:37 AM
Re: Backup performance
On the glance what did u exactly looked at?
is the db configured on a cooked FS or as raw volume?What are u backing up on normal file system?
what happes if you just fire a backup with a little amount of data to be backed up(while database down).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-21-2007 06:54 PM
тАО10-21-2007 06:54 PM
Re: Backup performance
Are you on 11.23 platform ? with JFS 4.1 ?
just want to confirm that
WK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-25-2007 05:11 PM
тАО10-25-2007 05:11 PM
Re: Backup performance
the fs is vxfs version 4. Ibackup normal dbf's.
The platform is 11.11.
It seems for me that a cacheing problem exists.
Best regards
Stefan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-28-2007 11:28 PM
тАО10-28-2007 11:28 PM
Re: Backup performance
if you have small number of filesystem , you cannot feed tape so tape stops and starts ;
in oracle online integration you can feed tha tape because instead of fs you will be sending datafiles and concurrency will be high than fs. it is normal behaivour.
mathmad.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 01:36 AM
тАО10-29-2007 01:36 AM
Re: Backup performance
the problem is solved.
There was an oversized kernel parameter.
....
Thanks a lot anyway!
Best regards
Stefan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 02:06 AM
тАО10-29-2007 02:06 AM
Re: Backup performance
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 02:24 AM
тАО10-29-2007 02:24 AM
Re: Backup performance
You wrote: "the problem is solved.
There was an oversized kernel parameter."
Please elaborate a little bit more?
First and foremost WHICH parameter(s)?
What old/new values?
What was the indication / trigger used to consider that parameter might be wrong?
Regards,
Hein
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 01:20 PM
тАО10-29-2007 01:20 PM
Re: Backup performance
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 07:54 PM
тАО10-29-2007 07:54 PM
Re: Backup performance
first of all, I am not a kernel tuning expert.
Here are the parms which have been changed:
Name Old value New Value
maxdsiz_64bit 4294967296 2147483648
Maxfiles 8192 2048
Maxssiz_64bit 268435456 1073741824
Maxtsiz 67108864 268435456
Maxuprc 4000 3686
Maxusers 256 48
Nclist 868 4196
Ncsize 22832 13528
Nfile 258000 124928
Ninode 17712 8408
Npty 4608 60
Nstrpty 3248 60
Semmnu 1024 4096
Shmseg 512 120
Best regards
Stefan