- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- process aborts (signal 6) with __sigenable
Operating System - HP-UX
1753261
Members
5000
Online
108792
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-25-2008 01:49 AM
тАО08-25-2008 01:49 AM
process aborts (signal 6) with __sigenable
Hi,
Our application process crashes, when i check the stack trace of all threads in the core file, i see only the following as suspicious.
Can anyone please explain what this means?
Thread 9 (system thread 4131915):
#0 0xc000000000047810:0 in __sigenable+0x50 () from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
#1 0xc00000000003d9c0:0 in apply_lazy_iplt_reloc+0x590 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
Our application process crashes, when i check the stack trace of all threads in the core file, i see only the following as suspicious.
Can anyone please explain what this means?
Thread 9 (system thread 4131915):
#0 0xc000000000047810:0 in __sigenable+0x50 () from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
#1 0xc00000000003d9c0:0 in apply_lazy_iplt_reloc+0x590 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-25-2008 07:51 AM
тАО08-25-2008 07:51 AM
Re: process aborts (signal 6) with __sigenable
This isn't the thread with the problem, the signal 6. What do the other threads look like?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-25-2008 03:54 PM
тАО08-25-2008 03:54 PM
Re: process aborts (signal 6) with __sigenable
All other threads are sleeping/waiting on condition variables...
These are the running threads: (obtained from the core file using gdb)
15 system thread 4131921 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
13 system thread 4131919 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
12 system thread 4131918 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
10 system thread 4131916 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
9 system thread 4131915 0xc000000000047810:0 in __sigenable+0x50 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
7 system thread 4131908 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
6 system thread 4131907 0xc00000000033d950:0 in _poll_sys+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
5 system thread 4131906 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
4 system thread 4131904 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
3 system thread 4131903 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
2 system thread 4131901 0xc00000000033e0d0:0 in _select_sys+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
1 system thread 4131900 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
These are the running threads: (obtained from the core file using gdb)
15 system thread 4131921 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
13 system thread 4131919 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
12 system thread 4131918 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
10 system thread 4131916 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
9 system thread 4131915 0xc000000000047810:0 in __sigenable+0x50 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/dld.so
7 system thread 4131908 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
6 system thread 4131907 0xc00000000033d950:0 in _poll_sys+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
5 system thread 4131906 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
4 system thread 4131904 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
3 system thread 4131903 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
2 system thread 4131901 0xc00000000033e0d0:0 in _select_sys+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
1 system thread 4131900 0xc00000000033ad50:0 in __ksleep+0x30 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-25-2008 09:30 PM
тАО08-25-2008 09:30 PM
Re: process aborts (signal 6) with __sigenable
>These are the running threads: (obtained from the core file using gdb)
Hmm, none of these look like they called abort. Did another process do a kill SIGABRT?
You might just give up on this and make sure you have the latest dld.so patch. There was a recent thread about a hang in apply_lazy_iplt_reloc.
Hmm, none of these look like they called abort. Did another process do a kill SIGABRT?
You might just give up on this and make sure you have the latest dld.so patch. There was a recent thread about a hang in apply_lazy_iplt_reloc.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP