- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- time syncronization linux w2k
Operating System - Linux
1753706
Members
4696
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2003 02:50 AM
09-03-2003 02:50 AM
Re: time syncronization linux w2k
BTW, I find it a lot more convenient to put all the active (uncommented) statements in the "ntp.conf" file at the *beginning*, so that you can see at a glance what you've got, rather than dispersing them throughout the comments. You can always scroll down to the comments if you forget exactly what the statements are doing ;>)
It looks to me that you've got 2 guys running, or trying to run:
xntpd
and ntpd
.
Did you download and compile your own latest version of the code? When you do this, the 'make' build produces 'ntpd'. Also, it looks like the latest rpm uses 'ntpd'.
I'm not sure of the origin of "xntpd", but I also run the ntp daemon as 'xntpd', mainly because that's the way HP did it for HP-UX, so when I was building for HP-UX, I kept the "xntpd" name. This means, of course, that after the build, I have to do my own manual install and change it from 'ntpd' (actually, I simply do symbolic links).
bv
It looks to me that you've got 2 guys running, or trying to run:
xntpd
and ntpd
.
Did you download and compile your own latest version of the code? When you do this, the 'make' build produces 'ntpd'. Also, it looks like the latest rpm uses 'ntpd'.
I'm not sure of the origin of "xntpd", but I also run the ntp daemon as 'xntpd', mainly because that's the way HP did it for HP-UX, so when I was building for HP-UX, I kept the "xntpd" name. This means, of course, that after the build, I have to do my own manual install and change it from 'ntpd' (actually, I simply do symbolic links).
bv
"The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." - Chaucer
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP