- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Drive Failure Protection; mirrorclone
HPE EVA Storage
1821815
Members
3690
Online
109638
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2007 07:04 AM
тАО10-08-2007 07:04 AM
Drive Failure Protection; mirrorclone
On an EVA6100, each disk group has a setting for "Drive Failure Protection", with options of None, Single, Double. Setting this to Single seems to claim additional space 2x the largest physical disk in the group. But if you're building LUNs with RAID 1 or RAID 5, what does this really buy you? Is DFP really needed with RAID?
Also, we're adding an EVA6100 into our storage environment with our existing EVA3000, and there is a new clone feature on the 6100 that we didn't have on the 3000 called mirrorclone. This is in addition to the snapshot and snapclone features, and am wondering how mirrorclone is different.
Thanks in advance.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2007 10:26 AM
тАО10-08-2007 10:26 AM
Re: Drive Failure Protection; mirrorclone
DFP could be though as the old "spare drives", that is, space that cannot be used, and the data will be reconstructed there if a disk fails.
This gives you more time to replace a failed disk, as your VDISKS won't be in "reduced" state for long time.
MirrorClone with fast resync : MirrorClone now allows a user to pre-normalize a mirror and then fracture the mirror to create an instantaneous byte-for-byte clone. MirrorClone also maintains its relationship with the source volume accelerating the re-sync time.
This gives you more time to replace a failed disk, as your VDISKS won't be in "reduced" state for long time.
MirrorClone with fast resync : MirrorClone now allows a user to pre-normalize a mirror and then fracture the mirror to create an instantaneous byte-for-byte clone. MirrorClone also maintains its relationship with the source volume accelerating the re-sync time.
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2007 02:23 PM
тАО10-08-2007 02:23 PM
Re: Drive Failure Protection; mirrorclone
Thanks for the reply and definitions Ivan. To my question though, what's your take on how useful that is in a disk group where all the LUNs are configured as R5? More than a definition, I'm looking for input from you and others to get a sense of perspective on the pros and cons of employing this. I'm not inclined to claim raw space if there isn't any specific benefit and a consultant has recommended a "none" setting. At the same time, I know that features like this are built into a system in response to some type of requirement or need and it must serve some useful purpose, so I'm somewhat suspicious of not using it at all.
In case you need it, here's some basic info on this SAN:
56 x 146GB 15K FC drives in DG1, 14 x 500GB FATA drives in DG2, 5 shelves, all full. SMS w/ CV7.
TIA
In case you need it, here's some basic info on this SAN:
56 x 146GB 15K FC drives in DG1, 14 x 500GB FATA drives in DG2, 5 shelves, all full. SMS w/ CV7.
TIA
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2007 07:43 PM
тАО10-08-2007 07:43 PM
Re: Drive Failure Protection; mirrorclone
The so-called "Drive Failure Protection" is a hard limit to reserve disk space for rebuilding redundancy after a disk drive has failed.
It:
- prevents you from accidently filling a disk group with too much data
- prevents vSnaps or the CA Write Log History to eat up space that might be needed for recovery
The EVA does work without any reservation - in fact, if a disk drive has failed, it first draws capacity from the space that is available for other storage (vdisks, snaps, WHL).
Using a level > "none" relieves you from manually monitoring your disk groups - I strongly recommend to use a value greater than "none", "single" is usually sufficient. It is also suggested in HP's best practice document.
It:
- prevents you from accidently filling a disk group with too much data
- prevents vSnaps or the CA Write Log History to eat up space that might be needed for recovery
The EVA does work without any reservation - in fact, if a disk drive has failed, it first draws capacity from the space that is available for other storage (vdisks, snaps, WHL).
Using a level > "none" relieves you from manually monitoring your disk groups - I strongly recommend to use a value greater than "none", "single" is usually sufficient. It is also suggested in HP's best practice document.
.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP