- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- LAN Routing
- >
- How to build a triple "ethernet repeater station"?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2015 05:36 AM
04-17-2015 05:36 AM
How to build a triple "ethernet repeater station"?
Hi,
I've got three embedded devices which are p2p connected to each other, meaning:
A <> B
A <> C
B <> C
Now I want to be a "ethernet repeater" between all three connections.
A <> me <> B
A <> me <> C
B <> me <> C
meaning, that all trafic goes through me. So I can delay, discard or alter the telegrams at my will.
I want to do this because my task is to test the reliabilty, robustness, timing, ... of those three connections.
I will use three IP aliases, so that A, B and C will communicate with normal IP-Adresses as before,
but those telegrams will get to me and I decide what to do with those telegrams.
Normally I will send the telegram to the normal destination, as a "ether repeater" would do.
I have got a HP 1810-8G and now I want to figure out how to configure the switch.
Net1: A and me
Net2: B and me
Net3: C and me
A, B and C should not be able to communicate directly with each other,
but me should be able to communicate to A, B and C, depending on their IP-addresses.
Therefor I will propably have to set permanently the correct mac-adresses via
arp -s ip-A mac-A
arp -s ip-B mac-B
arp -s ip-C mac-C
to assure that the mac-address-based switching will go to the right port of the switch.
If A, B or C sends a telegram he can do this only with the mac address of me, because the arp-telegrams
can only be answered by me.
So, if A sends a telegram to B, I will get it, and I will decide if I send it to B or instead to C, delay it, alter it, ...
In every Net (1, 2 or 3) my communication partner (A, B oder C) will think he is normally connected and
he communicates with B, C or A.
I've tried the task with VLANs but i cannot configure the me-port into three vlans, and if I use an "old school" ethernet hub to "triple me to three ports", I will have every telegramm from me in every single net (1, 2 and 3), which I NOT want.
How do I have to configure the 1810 (Trunk, VLAN, tagged/untagged, management port, ...)?
Kind regards
Martin, hoping you can help me
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-19-2015 06:49 PM
04-19-2015 06:49 PM
Re: How to build a triple "ethernet repeater station"?
The hardest part of what you are trying to do is this:
"if A sends a telegram to B, I will get it, and I will decide if I send it to B or instead to C,delay it, alter it, "
You might be able to do some of this at Layer2 (A, B, & C are on the same subnet and communicate by addressing each other's MAC), using Policy-based routing and Layer2 access lists, and NOT,
"If A, B or C sends a telegram he can do this only with the mac address of me".
Alternatively, if you want,
"If A, B or C sends a telegram he can do this only with the mac address of me"
to be true, then you need A, B, and C to all be in different subnets, with the switch performing the routing.
Essentially,
"I want to be a "ethernet repeater" between all three connections."
contradicts
"If A, B or C sends a telegram he can do this only with the mac address of me"
You're either a layer2 device, with all devices in the same subnet, or you are Layer3, with all devices in 3 different subnets joined by a router.
The 1810 is a very basic switch which doesn't allow a whole lot of network management - just a bit of stuff you can change in the GUI. I'm pretty sure it's not going to support policy-based routing, let alone this "delay it, alter it" stuff..