HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- APA software
Operating System - HP-UX
1826597
Members
3676
Online
109695
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2008 06:09 AM
09-19-2008 06:09 AM
APA software
Can someone tell me if APA can have an active/active configuration on two separate switches?
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2008 06:50 AM
09-19-2008 06:50 AM
Re: APA software
To a certain extent yes.
The switches need to be cascaded. We used Cisco 3850s ( i believe, 3000 somethings ;).
For load balance there are a couple different options. Typically LB_MAC is used with switches. LB_CPU is there as well but I never used/tested it.
Whether or not you can achieve a true 50-50 balance depends on the type of traffic and source/destinations. (it does not split session traffic, e.g. an ftp connection from one host will use the initial link for the duration of its session not flip back and forth while transfering data.
Been running with LB_MAC for many years and with my current work load the two NICs are pretty close to 50-50 on packets.
The switches need to be cascaded. We used Cisco 3850s ( i believe, 3000 somethings ;).
For load balance there are a couple different options. Typically LB_MAC is used with switches. LB_CPU is there as well but I never used/tested it.
Whether or not you can achieve a true 50-50 balance depends on the type of traffic and source/destinations. (it does not split session traffic, e.g. an ftp connection from one host will use the initial link for the duration of its session not flip back and forth while transfering data.
Been running with LB_MAC for many years and with my current work load the two NICs are pretty close to 50-50 on packets.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2008 07:05 AM
09-19-2008 07:05 AM
Re: APA software
Another note:
We had weird issues running LACP, which at the time was the preferred protocal to use in the cascaded switch arena.
During boot, the handshake took to long and the aggregate would not start during boot but started fine manually after boot. HP recommendation was to NOT user LACP.
We configured manual ( which is FEC, not FECAUTO(FECAUTO is PaGP ). All worked great but because there was no mgmt protocal with manual we lost the logging/error reporting abilities. Had to leave the monitoring of the aggregate up to the LAN guys.
We had weird issues running LACP, which at the time was the preferred protocal to use in the cascaded switch arena.
During boot, the handshake took to long and the aggregate would not start during boot but started fine manually after boot. HP recommendation was to NOT user LACP.
We configured manual ( which is FEC, not FECAUTO(FECAUTO is PaGP ). All worked great but because there was no mgmt protocal with manual we lost the logging/error reporting abilities. Had to leave the monitoring of the aggregate up to the LAN guys.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP