Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2003 07:38 PM
05-26-2003 07:38 PM
Core
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 01:45 AM
05-27-2003 01:45 AM
Re: Core
AFAIK there is no dedicated mechanism to block core generation.
However check the following:
1. Doesn't your executable change its working directory? Corefile is always created in current directory at the moment of generation.
2. Does your executable have permission to create new files in its working directory?
3. Check value of ulimit - this is sometimes used to block core generation.
Good luck
Adam
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 01:52 AM
05-27-2003 01:52 AM
Re: Core
TOC button on back of server/workstation ?
Paula
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 02:16 AM
05-27-2003 02:16 AM
Re: Core
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 02:45 AM
05-27-2003 02:45 AM
Re: Core
The core file is not generated because may be the size of the coredump file is fixed to zero
Check whether the following entry is there in the ".cshrc" file
"limit coredumpsize 0".
If so please remove this line from the ".cshrc" file.
Regards
Dipu
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 03:38 AM
05-27-2003 03:38 AM
Re: Core
coredump size.set with ulimit -c.
Are you using any gcc flags?Can also use
gdb with your build program and do tracing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 06:21 AM
05-27-2003 06:21 AM
Re: Core
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 06:21 AM
05-27-2003 06:21 AM
Re: Core
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-27-2003 06:25 AM
05-27-2003 06:25 AM
Re: Core
Manually inducing a program crash to cause a core dump is useless because the cause of your core dump (and thus the stack trace) would be completely unrelated to your problem.
Do a ulimit -a and see if the core file size is not set to zero. If it is zero, you've found your answer but otherwise you must examine your code for interrupt handlers.