- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Difference in df and du output
Operating System - HP-UX
1823415
Members
2447
Online
109655
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2007 07:47 PM
тАО07-15-2007 07:47 PM
Hi Guys,
We are having problem with one mount point which was not refreshing with the correct details in df command. This filesystem is of approximately 100Gb and it was used to 87% which comes around 87GB. Even after deleting more than 60GB it still shows the same details in df even after 2 days time. But where as du -sk shows that it was only 21Gb used. Here are the details:
$ bdf /u50
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vgEVA_R5/lvol9
102400000 88238110 13276832 87% /u50
$ pwd
/u50
$ du -sk
21494872 .
$
How can we get the df command to refresh its current details? DO we need to install some patch ? or can this be only reflected with correct details only after rebooting? Please help me find the answer. THanks in advance.
Regards,
Satish
We are having problem with one mount point which was not refreshing with the correct details in df command. This filesystem is of approximately 100Gb and it was used to 87% which comes around 87GB. Even after deleting more than 60GB it still shows the same details in df even after 2 days time. But where as du -sk shows that it was only 21Gb used. Here are the details:
$ bdf /u50
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vgEVA_R5/lvol9
102400000 88238110 13276832 87% /u50
$ pwd
/u50
$ du -sk
21494872 .
$
How can we get the df command to refresh its current details? DO we need to install some patch ? or can this be only reflected with correct details only after rebooting? Please help me find the answer. THanks in advance.
Regards,
Satish
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2007 08:06 PM
тАО07-15-2007 08:06 PM
Re: Difference in df and du output
Did you delete the 60 GB worth files while they were still been used by any processes ? If yes, then you can expect such behaviour. You could have checked using fuser if a file is being used by any process before deleting it.
Now if you can take an outage on your application which uses this filesystem, and then do a umount and mount that would give you the results you are expecting.
Regards,
Ninad
Now if you can take an outage on your application which uses this filesystem, and then do a umount and mount that would give you the results you are expecting.
Regards,
Ninad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-15-2007 08:25 PM
тАО07-15-2007 08:25 PM
Solution
Usually this happens if you deleted files that were in use by some process. In that case, the files vanish from the directory listings, but are not really deleted until that process stops using the files. This is normal Unix behavior.
In this situation, "ll" and "du" don't see the deleted files any more, but "df" will see that disk space is still used by something.
If you have the "lsof" command installed, you can use "lsof +L1" to find the processes that are holding the deleted files open.
If you don't have "lsof" installed, you'll need to use your knowledge of this particular system to find the correct processes - sometimes this is very difficult, so I recommend always installing the "lsof" command. It is available in the HP-UX Porting Archive:
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/ (US site)
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/ (mirror in UK)
http://hpux.its.tudelft.nl/ (mirror in NL)
Of course, rebooting the server will fix the problem because all processes are stopped and restarted, but it's not needed if you know which process(es) to stop.
Some applications create log files that grow without limit: if these applications are well-designed, they usually have some way to signal the application to close and re-open the log files. This is to allow rotating and cleaning up the log files without stopping the application. If the files you removed are log files, check if your application has this feature.
MK
In this situation, "ll" and "du" don't see the deleted files any more, but "df" will see that disk space is still used by something.
If you have the "lsof" command installed, you can use "lsof +L1" to find the processes that are holding the deleted files open.
If you don't have "lsof" installed, you'll need to use your knowledge of this particular system to find the correct processes - sometimes this is very difficult, so I recommend always installing the "lsof" command. It is available in the HP-UX Porting Archive:
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/ (US site)
http://hpux.connect.org.uk/ (mirror in UK)
http://hpux.its.tudelft.nl/ (mirror in NL)
Of course, rebooting the server will fix the problem because all processes are stopped and restarted, but it's not needed if you know which process(es) to stop.
Some applications create log files that grow without limit: if these applications are well-designed, they usually have some way to signal the application to close and re-open the log files. This is to allow rotating and cleaning up the log files without stopping the application. If the files you removed are log files, check if your application has this feature.
MK
MK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2007 04:26 AM
тАО07-17-2007 04:26 AM
Re: Difference in df and du output
I don't recommend booting the server to fix this problem.
fuser -u on the logical volume will show process id that have files in use.
A keen eye might help you pick out the process that needs stopped and restarted to free up the space.
Example:
On my system /usr/tmpi:
/dev/vg01/lvol18 1572864 980069 557168 64% /usr/tmpi
root:ecom1# fuser -u /dev/vg01/lvol18
/dev/vg01/lvol18: 12737c(root) 27023o(mercator) 520c(root) 15688c(roo
t) 14175c(root)
Fuser shows a userid mercator and root running.
A few ps -fe on process id on 27023 showed me that this was the culprit, and I killed the process.
Rory
Rory
fuser -u on the logical volume will show process id that have files in use.
A keen eye might help you pick out the process that needs stopped and restarted to free up the space.
Example:
On my system /usr/tmpi:
/dev/vg01/lvol18 1572864 980069 557168 64% /usr/tmpi
root:ecom1# fuser -u /dev/vg01/lvol18
/dev/vg01/lvol18: 12737c(root) 27023o(mercator) 520c(root) 15688c(roo
t) 14175c(root)
Fuser shows a userid mercator and root running.
A few ps -fe on process id on 27023 showed me that this was the culprit, and I killed the process.
Rory
Rory
There are a 100 ways to do things and 97 of them are right
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP