- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-08-2010 05:47 AM
тАО02-08-2010 05:47 AM
Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
We authenticate unix-users against AD, using Kerberos/PAM/ldapux/sshd - and it usualy works fine.
But right now we have a strange problem with one machine, giving us these errors in syslog when we try to login:
Feb 8 14:42:08 SERVER sshd[8114]: [Key table entry not found] Unable to verify host ticket
Feb 8 14:42:08 SERVER sshd[8114]: [Key table entry not found] can't verify v5 ticket: ; keytab found, assuming failure
Feb 8 14:42:08 SERVER sshd[8114]: while verifying tgt[Unknown code ____ 255]
Feb 8 14:42:08 SERVER sshd[8114]: [Authentication failed] Password not valid
Feb 8 14:42:10 SERVER sshd[8114]: error: PAM: No account present for user for myuser.in.AD
Kerberos from the prompt (using kdestroy, kinit, klist) works fine, pamkrbval works, pwget for users in the ldap-directory works, etc....I have NO idea what the problem is, as it usually works.
Thanks in advance
Danny
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-09-2010 04:49 AM
тАО02-09-2010 04:49 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
This is the software installed on the host:
kinit -kt /etc/krb5.keytab host/backup9F@VELUX.ORG
...works fine, indicating that the keytab-file is ok.
Software installed:
LDAPUX B.04.20 LDAP-UX Integration
PAMKerberos D.01.26 PAM-Kerberos Version 1.26
ixPAMmkdir A.10.00-1.0.002 Home Directory Creation
PHSS_40655 1.0 KRB5-Client Version 1.3.5.03 Cumulative patch
SecureShell A.05.10.026 HP-UX Secure Shell
sshd_config is configured for using PAM and kerberos.
Sorry for the missing information - hope somebody have an idea about what to look for.
Thanks in advance
Danny
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-09-2010 11:22 AM
тАО02-09-2010 11:22 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
1. Did I understand correctly that you have several systems running the same configuration, but only one giving you trouble? If so please review what changes happened to the server within the last 7 days prior to the problem starting.
2. Whether or not you can identify any changes, you need to begin the debugging process, which anyone with any long-term support experience will tell you is the same regardless of platform. It's a process of elimination. Start with verifying the various stages of the process. Keep ruling out things that are associated with functioning portions of this until you're left looking at that which doesn't funciton. Break down larger processes into their component steps and make sure you understand every one and that it's all working, for somewhere along the line, you'll find your problem.
3. Comparison - not knowing 'ldapux', I can't be specific, but review any configs, files, directories associated with this product and compare them to working versions on the servers without issues.
I could go on, but this is a start...
-RCP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-09-2010 11:57 AM
тАО02-09-2010 11:57 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
Maybe the access to the system is in the form of FQHN?
I would check if kvno values and encryption types matches besides host credentials.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-11-2010 12:52 AM
тАО02-11-2010 12:52 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
I finally got it to work - it was ALL me apparently, sorry guys :-( - it looks like a letter in the principal-name was uppercase in the keytab, but for some reason not on the KDC. This make the unknown error 255 apparently. Anyway, another thing that puzzles me, is that while testing, I tried to remove the keytab-file entirely - which make login using AD-accounts work. I didn't know that was possible? It just told me, as the keytab file was missing, it was assuming success.
But bottomline - thanks for the help guys, you rule.
Yours
Danny
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-14-2010 07:18 PM
тАО03-14-2010 07:18 PM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
We looking for same solution what u have now to authoricate unix system in ad
Can you provide detail procedure to do this
Chandra
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2010 12:47 AM
тАО03-15-2010 12:47 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
Well - thank god HP has made a excellent document since I implemented the solution, describing in detail what you should do:
http://docs.hp.com/en/16322/CIFSUnifiedLoginV2.pdf
Good luck :-)
Greetings
Danny
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2010 12:48 AM
тАО03-15-2010 12:48 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-28-2010 01:55 AM
тАО03-28-2010 01:55 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
Can you pls conform hpux ldap is free or need to purchase??
Chandra
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-28-2010 11:19 AM
тАО03-28-2010 11:19 AM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-01-2010 10:32 PM
тАО04-01-2010 10:32 PM
Re: Problem with Kerbereox/ldapux/sshd vs. Active Directory
Its one more question to you--we want use ads only for storing user and group attributes and to centralised athorizing users for unix servers.For this is it necessary to configure cifs and kerbrose auth for this??.
Chandra....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-02-2010 07:30 AM
тАО04-02-2010 07:30 AM