- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: sar -b
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-02-2004 11:32 PM
06-02-2004 11:32 PM
sar -b
I'm pasting the output of sar -b 4 5 below, is it indicates write cache problem in the system if yes what action i should take.
16:56:53 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s
16:56:57 0 467 100 5 6 17 0 0
16:57:01 0 342 100 4 4 6 0 0
16:57:05 0 334 100 2 3 36 0 0
16:57:09 0 334 100 3 2 0 0 0
16:57:13 0 336 100 3 3 0 0 0
Average 0 363 100 3 4 9 0 0
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-02-2004 11:38 PM
06-02-2004 11:38 PM
Re: sar -b
observe a little longer, maybe "sar -b 5 30" before making sure if the buffer cache is the bottleneck.
take note that %rcache >=90% and %wcache >=70% is a desirable figure.
regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-02-2004 11:44 PM
06-02-2004 11:44 PM
Re: sar -b
I don't think its write cache problem.
How are you comnig to this conclusion ?
sar -b
This command reports buffer activity.
bread/s : Number of physical reads per second from the disk (or other block devices)
to the buffer cache
bwrit/s : Number of physical writes per second from the buffer cache to the disk (or
other block device)
lread/s : Number of reads per second from buffer cache
lwrit/s : Number of writes per second to buffer cache
%rcache : Buffer cache hit ratio for read requests e.g., 1 - bread/lread
%wcache : Buffer cache hit ratio for write requests e.g., 1 - bwrit/lwrit
pread/s : Number of reads per second from character device using the physio()
(raw I/O) mechanism
pwrit/s : Number of writes per second to character device using the physio()
(i.e., raw I/O) mechanism mechanism.
What are you trying to monitor ?
you can try sar -d sar -u etc.., also
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-03-2004 01:28 AM
06-03-2004 01:28 AM
Re: sar -b
Bruno
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-03-2004 01:37 AM
06-03-2004 01:37 AM
Re: sar -b
If write cache rate is not constantly aroung 80 %, you can very well reduce buffer cache and make that saved memory available to users. What you run on this box?
My experience shows that with buffer cache set 300-800 mb, gives good performance. The buffer read and write chache hits are good enough around 85-90 %, so that buffer cache is effectively used.
Anil