GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Sendmail: Patch & IPF or Remove?
Operating System - HP-UX
1847040
Members
3898
Online
110261
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2003 04:46 PM
03-11-2003 04:46 PM
Context: I work at a bank, and we get an awful lot of security warnings, the most recent about sendmail.
General Question: Are the latest patches enough to address standard security concerns? I have the option to turn it off completely, as it's not being used, except by the system itself for various messages generated when I do software installs, etc. The systems are devoted to other uses.
Specific Question: If inclined, how would I go about removing sendmail from the system, is it as simple as swremove and clearning out the mail queue? Bonus: Can't a few nifty IPF rules solve this and leave the nicely patched sendmail intact?
General Question: Are the latest patches enough to address standard security concerns? I have the option to turn it off completely, as it's not being used, except by the system itself for various messages generated when I do software installs, etc. The systems are devoted to other uses.
Specific Question: If inclined, how would I go about removing sendmail from the system, is it as simple as swremove and clearning out the mail queue? Bonus: Can't a few nifty IPF rules solve this and leave the nicely patched sendmail intact?
"Unix is the Net"
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2003 04:54 PM
03-11-2003 04:54 PM
Solution
Hi Karl,
No need to remove sendmail, just turn off it's ability to accept mail. That's what this latest exploit was targeting - systems that *accept* mail.
To stop sendmail run
/sbin/init.d/sendmail stop
Then to disable it from starting at next boot edit
/etc/rc.config.d/mailservs
and set
export SENDMAIL_SERVER=0
I doubt IPF rules would stop this exploit. The header was where the danger was & I'm not sure IPF can interrogate the header of mail msgs.
Rgds,
Jeff
No need to remove sendmail, just turn off it's ability to accept mail. That's what this latest exploit was targeting - systems that *accept* mail.
To stop sendmail run
/sbin/init.d/sendmail stop
Then to disable it from starting at next boot edit
/etc/rc.config.d/mailservs
and set
export SENDMAIL_SERVER=0
I doubt IPF rules would stop this exploit. The header was where the danger was & I'm not sure IPF can interrogate the header of mail msgs.
Rgds,
Jeff
PERSEVERANCE -- Remember, whatever does not kill you only makes you stronger!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2003 07:57 PM
03-11-2003 07:57 PM
Re: Sendmail: Patch & IPF or Remove?
We have faced similar concerns. Our systems use sendmail to route outbound messages from cron to mailboxes that indicate the cron job has succeeded in doing important things like backing up the database.
So sendmail has to run and its possible to direct mail at this exploit with a telnet session.
So we installed the latest sendmail 8.11.1 patch and will be installed the new binaries after making sure the patch didn't do anything bad.
Here is how we keep up on these security issues.
Fist we subscribe to itrc security bulletins, which you apparently already do.
Next we use the following tools to harden security on our system and notify us of security patches.
Bastille Security hardening
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B6849AA
Perl which the above needs.
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=PERL
Security Patch Check
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B6834AA
TCP Wrappers
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=TCPWRAP
IDS/9000 (Intrusion Detection Sytstem)
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=J5083AA
Get all these products working you'll be quite secure.
SEP
So sendmail has to run and its possible to direct mail at this exploit with a telnet session.
So we installed the latest sendmail 8.11.1 patch and will be installed the new binaries after making sure the patch didn't do anything bad.
Here is how we keep up on these security issues.
Fist we subscribe to itrc security bulletins, which you apparently already do.
Next we use the following tools to harden security on our system and notify us of security patches.
Bastille Security hardening
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B6849AA
Perl which the above needs.
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=PERL
Security Patch Check
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B6834AA
TCP Wrappers
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=TCPWRAP
IDS/9000 (Intrusion Detection Sytstem)
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=J5083AA
Get all these products working you'll be quite secure.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP