- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Why this difference
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:06 AM
12-02-2005 03:06 AM
Why this difference
Why the difference?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:10 AM
12-02-2005 03:10 AM
Re: Why this difference
dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pc?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:11 AM
12-02-2005 03:11 AM
Re: Why this difference
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:21 AM
12-02-2005 03:21 AM
Re: Why this difference
server to a 1GB server...
Probably have different swap sizes as well...
Are both servers running exactly the same apps after boot is started? or are some things turned off (samba for example) on the 1GB box but turned on the 10 GB box?
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:26 AM
12-02-2005 03:26 AM
Re: Why this difference
-both systems have 5 as dbc_min, but the 2600 has only 1 GB RAM (then 50 MB min buffer cache) while the 4640 has 10 GB RAM (then 500 MB buffer)
-The 4640 uses 500-700 MB more at boot, grossly coinciding with the differences between buffer cache.
Do you think a 3 dbc_min and 6 dbc_max will be appropriate for a 10 GB RAM server running Oracle on raw dvices?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:28 AM
12-02-2005 03:28 AM
Re: Why this difference
different swap sizes could effect the available RAM memory?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 03:42 AM
12-02-2005 03:42 AM
Re: Why this difference
Normal recommendations specify 300 to 400 MB, so 3% seems appropriate. If you have Glance installed it should be easy to measure how well this is working.
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 04:06 AM
12-02-2005 04:06 AM
Re: Why this difference
Take a look at:
http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/devresource/Docs/TechPapers/UXPerfCookBook.pdf
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 04:47 AM
12-02-2005 04:47 AM
Re: Why this difference
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2005 04:48 AM
12-02-2005 04:48 AM