- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: DL360 G5 : degraded disk IO performance
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2013 07:27 AM
09-09-2013 07:27 AM
DL360 G5 : degraded disk IO performance
Hello all,
we have a couple of DL360 G5 machines. All of them have the Smart Array P400i RAID controllers with 512 MB BBWC.
In one machine (let's call it "A") we have built 2 RAID arrays:
- 3x 72 GB 10k rpm SAS disks in RAID-5
- 3x 500 GB 7.2k rpm SATA disks in RAID-5
This machine has only 8 GB of RAM installed (8x 1 GB).
The other machines (let's call them "B") have only one RAID array configured: 3x 144 GB 10k rpm SAS disks in RAID-5. These other machines have 32 GB of RAM installed (8x 4 GB).
We're facing an interesting problem: the disk IO performance of machine "A" is really slow in case of both RAID arrays. When we use the faster array (with the 10k rpm SAS disks) the average speed in random write/read tests is 26 MB/sec. When we use the slower array (with the 7.2k rpm SATA disks) the average speed in random write/read tests is 13 MB/sec.
On the "B" machines we have significantly faster IO speeds: more than 450 MB/sec in average in the same read/write tests.
The tests were performed with the Phoronix Test Suite (same version and same benchmarks on all the machines, with the same settings).
I checked machine "A" with the HP Insight Diagnosis tool and the health status of all the disks and of the RAID controller is OK, there are no errors indicated. There's one non-related (at least in my opinion it shouldn't cause these problems) error: the "serial port #1" is faulty.
Is it possible that using SATA and SAS disks on the same controller causes this very slow disk IO performance? Initially I ruled out this option, because if the RAID controller would run in the "fallback mode", it should be still faster than the performance I measured. Or am I wrong?
Is it possible that the faulty "serial port #1" affects the disk IO performance?
Thank you in advance
- Tags:
- RAID
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2013 07:58 AM
09-09-2013 07:58 AM
Re: DL360 G5 : degraded disk IO performance
Hi,
Double check that on Machine A you have the write cache set to enabled, by default it's set to 100% read caching.
Try setting it to 50-50 & see how you get on & also try enabling the drive's own write caches.
Hope this helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2013 05:28 AM
09-10-2013 05:28 AM
Re: DL360 G5 : degraded disk IO performance
Hello,
thank you for the hint. How can I check that? Using hpacucli?
Thanks in advance