- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- ServiceGuard Beginners Guide
Operating System - Linux
1752555
Members
5323
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2006 07:11 PM
тАО09-19-2006 07:11 PM
ServiceGuard Beginners Guide
Greetings.
We are looking to implement a load-balanced with HA environment with 2 rx4640's running RedHat Linux 4AS. This would be to support Oracle 10g Application Server (specifically forms and reports).
Question is, "Is ServiceGuard the way to go?"
A sobering thought: What if, right at this very moment, I am living up to my full potential?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2006 11:32 PM
тАО09-19-2006 11:32 PM
Re: ServiceGuard Beginners Guide
I don't think ServiceGuard is the way to go.
SG is an active / passive environment.
So your application server will always run on one node.
I think it is better to build a pool off application servers.
SG is an active / passive environment.
So your application server will always run on one node.
I think it is better to build a pool off application servers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-22-2006 01:39 AM
тАО09-22-2006 01:39 AM
Re: ServiceGuard Beginners Guide
Serviceguard itself does not do "incoming" load-balancing. From your question, I think you understand that.
SGLX can obviously handle failover between the two servers. If the same app can have two instances running on the same server, then using Serviceguard might help. If the apps have "intermediate state" state is saved then you will likely get advantage. Consider the following:
If you have an app that has two instances call them APP-A-1 and APP-A-2. They are initially running on two servers with the load balancer "feeding" requests to each. They are saving state on shared storage.
Then the server running APP-A-1 fails. It is then restarted on the other server and recovers some state. Since the "real" IP address for APP-A-1 fails over as well, the client reattaches (assuming it does not time out). You continue on with the client saving the need to re-enter a transaction.
If the senario I describe works in your environment, then you can get an advantage. If there is no state saved or the client doesn't stay attached, then your not likely to get an advantage from an HA failover product like Servicegaurd for Linux.
SGLX can obviously handle failover between the two servers. If the same app can have two instances running on the same server, then using Serviceguard might help. If the apps have "intermediate state" state is saved then you will likely get advantage. Consider the following:
If you have an app that has two instances call them APP-A-1 and APP-A-2. They are initially running on two servers with the load balancer "feeding" requests to each. They are saving state on shared storage.
Then the server running APP-A-1 fails. It is then restarted on the other server and recovers some state. Since the "real" IP address for APP-A-1 fails over as well, the client reattaches (assuming it does not time out). You continue on with the client saving the need to re-enter a transaction.
If the senario I describe works in your environment, then you can get an advantage. If there is no state saved or the client doesn't stay attached, then your not likely to get an advantage from an HA failover product like Servicegaurd for Linux.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-22-2006 02:17 AM
тАО09-22-2006 02:17 AM
Re: ServiceGuard Beginners Guide
Shalom,
With RH you have the option of using RH clustering as well. I've gotten pretty decent results with it over the past year with seven or eight production clusters at this time.
If you want load balancing you need either a smart round robin dns system that does not hand out dead ip addresses or a dns load balancer. The second option runs between $2,000 and $5,000, but does balance the load.
You may be able to team nic cards with RH NIC bonding. I've never done that with an rx4640 server but its pretty easy with a 32 bit wintel server.
SEP
With RH you have the option of using RH clustering as well. I've gotten pretty decent results with it over the past year with seven or eight production clusters at this time.
If you want load balancing you need either a smart round robin dns system that does not hand out dead ip addresses or a dns load balancer. The second option runs between $2,000 and $5,000, but does balance the load.
You may be able to team nic cards with RH NIC bonding. I've never done that with an rx4640 server but its pretty easy with a 32 bit wintel server.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP