- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Re: Ultrium 448 internal sas tape drive really slo...
StoreEver Tape Storage
1753752
Members
5280
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-04-2009 04:31 AM
тАО09-04-2009 04:31 AM
Ultrium 448 internal sas tape drive really slow
Ultrium 448 internal sas is really slow in reading and consequently writing files.
Dev Perf in L&TT is OK and i think there is a bottleneck in reading.
Attached the support ticket
Dev Perf in L&TT is OK and i think there is a bottleneck in reading.
Attached the support ticket
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-04-2009 05:40 AM
тАО09-04-2009 05:40 AM
Re: Ultrium 448 internal sas tape drive really slow
Fabio you have lots of Test Unit Ready (TUR)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842411/en
Pablo Alvarado Siles
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842411/en
Pablo Alvarado Siles
Pablo Alv Siles
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-07-2009 10:24 PM
тАО09-07-2009 10:24 PM
Re: Ultrium 448 internal sas tape drive really slow
I've disabled TUR on Device but nothing have changed.
With previous DAT 72 with USB connection all worked properly.
Any other idea?
With previous DAT 72 with USB connection all worked properly.
Any other idea?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-08-2009 12:57 PM
тАО09-08-2009 12:57 PM
Re: Ultrium 448 internal sas tape drive really slow
Is the LTO drive slower than the DAT drive was?
The tape drive doesn't actually read files from your disk; the backup application asks the file system to provide the files, and then writes them to tape. So if reads from disk are slow, it's probably the file system. Have you used L&TT to benchmark the disk you're trying to back up? How does L&TT read performance compare to the backup speeds you're seeing?
If the problem is your read speed, you can try defragmenting your disk, moving to faster disk (hardware RAID, particularly RAID 1+0 instead of single disks or SW RAID), or sending multiple streams of data to the tape drive at once. Or, the biggest improvement is likely to be changing to an image backup (where the disk is read sequentially, block-by-block, instead of randomly, file-by-file) -- but restore from a sequential backup will typically take longer than a restore from a file backup.
Other considerations -- I have seen backup job performance drop as much as 50% when the backup application is used to do either compression or encryption -- make sure you're using the tape drive for compression, and evaluate your encryption strategy (consider using LTO-4 and its HW encryption) if applicable.
All the above assumes you're doing a local backup -- there are some other considerations if you are doing a backup over the network.
The tape drive doesn't actually read files from your disk; the backup application asks the file system to provide the files, and then writes them to tape. So if reads from disk are slow, it's probably the file system. Have you used L&TT to benchmark the disk you're trying to back up? How does L&TT read performance compare to the backup speeds you're seeing?
If the problem is your read speed, you can try defragmenting your disk, moving to faster disk (hardware RAID, particularly RAID 1+0 instead of single disks or SW RAID), or sending multiple streams of data to the tape drive at once. Or, the biggest improvement is likely to be changing to an image backup (where the disk is read sequentially, block-by-block, instead of randomly, file-by-file) -- but restore from a sequential backup will typically take longer than a restore from a file backup.
Other considerations -- I have seen backup job performance drop as much as 50% when the backup application is used to do either compression or encryption -- make sure you're using the tape drive for compression, and evaluate your encryption strategy (consider using LTO-4 and its HW encryption) if applicable.
All the above assumes you're doing a local backup -- there are some other considerations if you are doing a backup over the network.
--
Liberty breeds responsibility; Government breeds dependence
Liberty breeds responsibility; Government breeds dependence
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP