- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- Left Hand P4300
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-18-2010 09:02 AM
тАО02-18-2010 09:02 AM
Re: Left Hand P4300
The reason I sometimes elect to use ESXi is as follows:
Let's say you have a power failure, your ESX boxes reboot, they take a long time to timeout connecting to your Lefthand iSCSI targets. Your FoM can't come online until your ESX box completely finishes the boot process.
The ESXi box using local storage only can boot quickly, and launch the FoM thus getting your quorum re-established faster.
Plus I usually have some leftover hardware from a virtualization consolidation project, and have some management tools VMs running on an ESXi box anyway, so It's certainly not a requirement, but I like the recovery design of using an off-cluster ESXi utility host.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-24-2012 02:13 PM
тАО09-24-2012 02:13 PM
Re: Left Hand P4300
I'm new to HP SANs and am trying to configure something every similar to what you mention here.
I have two HP P4300 in two sites, in order to have each site work independently if the fiber is cut would I need to create two clusters?
Which method would be best to use for having the data available at both sites?
Thanks,
Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2012 12:54 PM
тАО09-25-2012 12:54 PM
Re: Left Hand P4300
You can never have two copies of a LUN available on two different sites while the two sites aren't in communication with eachother. Ask youself how it should handle a situation where one site writes anything to the LUN and then the other site writes something else to the same spot!
read up on the DR manual HP provides as that should help with your planning. With two independent clusters, you can always do failover/failback and/or read-only access while the primary is available. For a single multi-site cluster, there are other complications, but if the link goes down ONE site will work and the other won't, you can design which will stop, but one simply has to stop to prevent data corruption of the cluster and corrutption is more of a problem than uptime is.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »