- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Redundancy between 3500yl and 3400cl
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1748204
Members
4021
Online
108759
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-25-2009 10:44 PM
тАО02-25-2009 10:44 PM
Hello Guys,
I have two procurve L3 switches: 3500yl and 3400cl.
I want to configure them in such a way that when one switch fails other switch takes over.
The problem is that 3500yl supports VRRP and 3400cl supports XRRP. These two protocols are not compatible with each other.
Can you guys suggest me any other way to configure those for Redundancy?
I have two procurve L3 switches: 3500yl and 3400cl.
I want to configure them in such a way that when one switch fails other switch takes over.
The problem is that 3500yl supports VRRP and 3400cl supports XRRP. These two protocols are not compatible with each other.
Can you guys suggest me any other way to configure those for Redundancy?
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-27-2009 11:50 PM
тАО02-27-2009 11:50 PM
Re: Redundancy between 3500yl and 3400cl
Somebody please help, i am in trouble..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-28-2009 01:25 AM
тАО02-28-2009 01:25 AM
Solution
For L3 redundancy (VRRP or XRRP), you won't be able to do it mixing these two products. You'll need to have the same of either model.
If you want just L2 redundancy, you can use spanning-tree or meshing on these products which will interoperate.
If you want just L2 redundancy, you can use spanning-tree or meshing on these products which will interoperate.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-26-2009 01:11 AM
тАО03-26-2009 01:11 AM
Re: Redundancy between 3500yl and 3400cl
It seems that i have to buy a new switch then.
What do you guys suggest?
Is 3400cl is better option because of the XRRP support?
What do you guys suggest?
Is 3400cl is better option because of the XRRP support?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP