- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Emulex 1105e HP
Operating System - Linux
1753787
Members
7869
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2010 02:31 AM
05-10-2010 02:31 AM
Emulex 1105e HP
We have installed 2007-lpfc drivers in ours two RHEL5.3 server's. Our 4100 EVA, has presented 1 LUN 10GB, in tow server's.
The server's can view perfectly this LUN, but when we try to writte fron one sever, you can writte, but the other server can't view the same data.
If you restart the server that can't view the LUN data, you can view the same information, but only read access.
How we can change this situation? We've tried the last drivers 2009-lpfc, and didn't work, compilation error.
Thanks.
The server's can view perfectly this LUN, but when we try to writte fron one sever, you can writte, but the other server can't view the same data.
If you restart the server that can't view the LUN data, you can view the same information, but only read access.
How we can change this situation? We've tried the last drivers 2009-lpfc, and didn't work, compilation error.
Thanks.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-11-2010 09:52 AM
05-11-2010 09:52 AM
Re: Emulex 1105e HP
What's the filesystem type you're using? Regular ext3 or a cluster filesystem like GFS or OCFS?
A regular filesystem like ext3 has a built-in assumption that the filesystem will be mounted by one server at a time only. This allows extensive caching to improve filesystem performance.
When server B changes data on the disk, the server A may have an old version of the same data in its cache. Because a regular filesystem does not expect the data to change on the disk, server A will happily give the old version of the data from the cache to any application that asks for it. Sooner or later an application on server A will want something was not cached, so the server A will load more data from the disk. As a result, server A will have a corrupt mixture of old and updated data in its cache. The situation is symmetrical: the same may happen on server B too.
If only one server is allowed to write to the disk, the problem is still there: the server with the read-only access still cannot know when the data it recently read from the disk is being modified by the other server. The server with the read-only access will again get corrupted data, unless all disk caching is prevented on that filesystem (which would hurt performance very much).
So, you cannot simply present a regular filesystem to 2 or more servers simultaneously and have it work. You need a cluster filesystem: it will communicate between the servers, so that all the servers are aware what blocks each server is writing and can throw away old data in their read caches as necessary. A cluster filesystem will also implement some sort of cluster-wide file and/or block locking, to prevent any attempts to read any disk block that is being written to at the same time.
RHEL 5 includes GFS cluster filesystem, but setting it up requires that you first configure the basic elements of a RedHat Cluster, to implement the cluster-wide locking infrastructure that is required by GFS.
Note: to use RedHat Cluster and GFS, you will need the Advanced Platform version of the RHEL 5 license.
MK
A regular filesystem like ext3 has a built-in assumption that the filesystem will be mounted by one server at a time only. This allows extensive caching to improve filesystem performance.
When server B changes data on the disk, the server A may have an old version of the same data in its cache. Because a regular filesystem does not expect the data to change on the disk, server A will happily give the old version of the data from the cache to any application that asks for it. Sooner or later an application on server A will want something was not cached, so the server A will load more data from the disk. As a result, server A will have a corrupt mixture of old and updated data in its cache. The situation is symmetrical: the same may happen on server B too.
If only one server is allowed to write to the disk, the problem is still there: the server with the read-only access still cannot know when the data it recently read from the disk is being modified by the other server. The server with the read-only access will again get corrupted data, unless all disk caching is prevented on that filesystem (which would hurt performance very much).
So, you cannot simply present a regular filesystem to 2 or more servers simultaneously and have it work. You need a cluster filesystem: it will communicate between the servers, so that all the servers are aware what blocks each server is writing and can throw away old data in their read caches as necessary. A cluster filesystem will also implement some sort of cluster-wide file and/or block locking, to prevent any attempts to read any disk block that is being written to at the same time.
RHEL 5 includes GFS cluster filesystem, but setting it up requires that you first configure the basic elements of a RedHat Cluster, to implement the cluster-wide locking infrastructure that is required by GFS.
Note: to use RedHat Cluster and GFS, you will need the Advanced Platform version of the RHEL 5 license.
MK
MK
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP