- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Linux HA solution
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-25-2007 09:34 PM
тАО10-25-2007 09:34 PM
I have two live linux sever , they run different application , have different IP address & different user a/c , both of them connect to the SAN server with Fibra channel , the hardware has already been setup and works fine , the SAN has clustering function that mean the database is physically located at SAN (different path) , both servers can access all these database . We have windows DNS server to resolve the host name , so user can connect the specific server with the host name .
Now , I would like to setup the HA solution , what I would like is when one of server is broken then another server can take up the responsibility , allow user to login .
My question is when a server is broken , how it can automatically re-direct the user from broken server to another server ? Do I need to setup LDAP ? Do I need to do something in DNS server ?
Can anyone advise what I need to do
Thx in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-26-2007 12:06 AM
тАО10-26-2007 12:06 AM
SolutionRed Hat Cluster Suite is my favorite HA solution for clustering.
Yes, you should maintain accurate user accounts using LDAP.
>> The SAN has clustering function that mean the database is physically located at SAN (different path) , both servers can access all these database
Don't start confusing concepts. The Storage may provide shared access, but this is not clustering. Shared file system (cluster file system) is required for simultaneous access. This is provided by the O.S. for example, with Oracle OCFS2 or Red Hat GFS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-27-2007 01:00 AM
тАО10-27-2007 01:00 AM
Re: Linux HA solution
Take a look at:
http://h18026.www1.hp.com/solutions/enterprise/highavailability/linux/serviceguard/index.html
http://www.steeleye.com/products/linux/
There are of course other possible solutions (as mentioned by the previous poster) - some are cool, some are a bit clunky. It depends on what you are after!
Regards
Colin.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-27-2007 05:16 AM
тАО10-27-2007 05:16 AM
Re: Linux HA solution
LifeKeeper is a bit more intuitive to use than Serviceguard.
Serviceguard and LifeKeeper are similiar as they use virtual IP's. LifeKeeper can failover either of your applications to the other system when it fails, I'm pretty sure Serviceguard will do the same.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-28-2007 08:52 PM
тАО10-28-2007 08:52 PM
Re: Linux HA solution
Logins can easily be handled in a number of ways.
Samba integration to a foreign Windows ADS server.
NIS
LDAP
LDAP is the preferred choice. Master/slave setup.
The rest can be handled by Red Hat Cluster suite.
A DNS based solution will not work well because DNS is not really smart enough to know whether the target node is responding. Just point the DNS A record to the floating IP address of the cluster.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-29-2007 06:15 AM
тАО10-29-2007 06:15 AM
Re: Linux HA solution
IP failover works the about same for most clusters. So as was mentioned, it is probably better to set up an IP address and a server alias name for the application rather than trying to have the DNS know when to fail over.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2007 05:25 AM
тАО11-08-2007 05:25 AM
Re: Linux HA solution
I'm using it right now on a testing environment and it works pretty well.
You'll have a VIP (virtual IP) to connect to the cluster and heartbeat is taking care to do all the work in the case one server fails.
You can check on http://www.linux-ha.org/
Pier