- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- online jfs + size of root /
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-23-2001 07:43 AM
тАО10-23-2001 07:43 AM
2 N Class and one L Class.
We have been told conflicting
things concerning online jfs.
Our root / directory is 155648
on both N Class machines and
147456 on our L Class machine.
I assume these to be defaults as
no one has adjusted them since
installation.
Questions:
1. Since root / must be
contiguous space is it correct
to assume online jfs will not
help in expanding this?
2. The L Class is used for
tape backups only of business
copy volumes. Would it be unwise
to install online jfs from a
financial view?
3. What is the norm for the
size of root /?
I realize this will very according
to shop but am looking for a mean
value.
Note: My apologies for the empty
postin yesterday. Seems any submit I
attempted failed.
Thanks for any and all input.
dl
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-23-2001 07:55 AM
тАО10-23-2001 07:55 AM
Solutioncontiguous space is it correct to assume online jfs will not help in expanding this?
> I tested this today, and
> ran into trouble..
> but I was doing /stand (oops!)..
> could recover though
> lvchange will change strictness
>
2. The L Class is used for
tape backups only of business
copy volumes. Would it be unwise
to install online jfs from a
financial view?
> I dunno, depends if you think
> that increasing the vg00
> filesystems offline
> (30 mins work max) will
> mean the licence fee in
> lost revenue..
> probably not..
3. What is the norm for the
size of root /?
I realize this will very according
to shop but am looking for a mean
value.
>
> 143360 55195 82669 40% /
on a 18G disk A500.
I don't need much, for my case, /opt/ and /var are 50% of the disk..
Later,
Bill
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-23-2001 08:00 AM
тАО10-23-2001 08:00 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
1) You are correct, / must be contiguous so OnlineJFS is no help. The supported methed is to do a make_tape_recovery and Ignite to restore your system.
2) My suggestion is that every box needs OnlineJFS; you get so many more features other than extending filesystems. I suspect that the expense of the product is more than offset by the decrease in admin time and downtime. You also get snapshot mounts which can let you rethink how you approach backups and mount options that let you have essentially raw/io while using cooked files.
3) While it is true that / should essentially never grow, I alway size it and stand bigger than necessary so that OS upgrades are possible. A few of those upgrades (rather than cold installs) actually work well now. I've done one in a ServiceGuard environment and it went very smoothly. It would not have had I used the default sizes for /. I've would suggest about 160-200 MB for / and about 100-128MB for /stand. It's overkill but you should then be able to upgrade no matter what. If you have OnlineJFS, you can expand the other filesystems on as as needed basis and there is no need to size them large. One other point, I typically only configure about 256MB of primary swap and the other swap is either on another volume group or filesystem swap (if I'm really not going to swap).
Regards, Clay
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-23-2001 08:04 AM
тАО10-23-2001 08:04 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
First, the root ("/") directory shouldn't be the respository of much of anything. Somewhere around 140MB size is more than adequate. "Off" of root you can define and mount other directories.
Second, in my opinion, Online JFS is a *must* on any server. Not only do I want to be able to expand a filesytem without having to unmount it, but I also want the performance benefits I can achieve with some of the JFS mount options that are only available with Online JFS -- noteably 'mincache=direct,con
vosync=direct' for database filesystems.
Lastly, yes, the root filesystem must be contiguous. *BUT* with Online JFS it is possible to extend the root filesytem. The procedure is described in Technical Knowledge Base docuement #KBRC00006582.
However, as indicated, the root filesystem doesn't need to be very large. The appropriate thing to do is create mountpoints "off" of it to hold data.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-23-2001 02:26 PM
тАО10-23-2001 02:26 PM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
I guess I will bite the bullet and order online jfs for the L Class.
dl
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-16-2001 07:24 AM
тАО11-16-2001 07:24 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
I guess my question is - why would you want to increase the size of the root file system?
You really shouldn't need more then 140MB.
Here's what we do for a "standard" HP build"
Preamble: VG00 - VG09 are internal disks and VG10 and up are on EMC(or other external disk storage).
VG00
The root volume group VG00 should be mirrored and only contain OS files.
Primary swap should be 1 x memory
/ - 140MB (HP Default)
/usr - 1 GB
/var - 1GB
/tmp - 512MB
/stand - 128MB
/var/adm/crash - 1 x memory + 512MB
/opt - 1GB
/home - 512MB with quotas (32MB soft, 64MB hard)
Note: /var/tmp should be a symbolic link to /tmp. /tmp should be 1777 (sticky bit).
VG01
/app - 512MB
/usr/local - 512MB
/app/admin - 512MB
VG02
File system swap
VG03
Applications
VG04-VG09
Reserved
VG10 - VG29
Log volumes (redo, archive, etc)
VG30 - VG256
Data volumes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-16-2001 07:39 AM
тАО11-16-2001 07:39 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
I use 1.2G for /root on my dedicated DNS servers, the only other lvols are /stand, and /var.
On the other servers /root is 500 meg. All the other big dirs are broken out.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-16-2001 08:13 AM
тАО11-16-2001 08:13 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
We always use online JFS and Mirror/UX
/ 140 MG vxfs
/stand 85 MG hfs
/var 1 GB vxfs
/usr 2.5 GB vxfs
/tmp 155 MG vxfs
/opt 625 MG vxfs
/home 20 MG vxfs
and some swap space
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-16-2001 08:15 AM
тАО11-16-2001 08:15 AM
Re: online jfs + size of root /
Online jfs is worth the money on machine.
Don't you have other volume groups/file systems other than vg00. Managing them will be much easier with Online JFS.
Thanks.
Prashant.