- Community Home
- >
- Welcome
- >
- Feedback
- >
- Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2011 10:13 AM
07-05-2011 10:13 AM
Sort Order when using "View All"
The only way I have found to simulate the functionality of the former ITRC, where I could just sit at the HP-UX home page and refresh to see the most recently update threads, is to go to "Operating Systems" > "HP-UX", scroll down to Recent Topics and click on View All. However, there doesn't appear to be any rhyme or reason to the order in which messages appear. Right now, for example, the messages were last replied to 59 minutes ago, 3 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 1 hour ago. Why isn't the most current always on top?
Pete
Pete
- Tags:
- post order
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 01:15 AM
07-06-2011 01:15 AM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
This is already being discussed here:
It's by topic order, not post order.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 03:07 AM
07-06-2011 03:07 AM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
Thanks, Dennis. It sure sucks, though!
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 03:17 AM - edited 10-19-2013 07:31 PM
07-06-2011 03:17 AM - edited 10-19-2013 07:31 PM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
>It sure sucks, though!
I assume they'll be fixing it.
In the meantime, I mistakenly set all post as read but I can use that to look at all boards with new posts.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 05:24 AM
07-06-2011 05:24 AM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
> in order by topic
I don't think that's right, either. Right now I'm looking at HP-UX > All Topics and the following are listed:
General 2 hours ago
General 2 hours ago
LVM and VxVM 3 hours ago
General 2 hours ago
Frankly, that looks pretty much completely random to me.
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 10:10 AM
07-06-2011 10:10 AM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
>that looks pretty much completely random to me.
It is in order by topic but you are looking at the by last post dates. The column title even says that.
(I find it more helpful to not have relative dates. Are you asking for them on purpose?)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-06-2011 10:32 AM
07-06-2011 10:32 AM
Re: Sort Order when using "View All"
It probably doesn't matter - I don't think I have the patience to participate in this farce anyway.
Everyone questioned why HP felt the need to change something that we, the community, had worked very hard, along with HP, to make the best source of technical knowledge exchange around. Nobody answered, except to say that it would have wonderful new features - features that no one had asked for.
Has anyone else noticed the extreme lack of participation? Neither questioners nor answerers seem to be in abundance around here. Gee, I wonder why that is.
Pete