- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
Categories
Company
Local Language
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.This widget could not be displayed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-30-2004 03:54 AM
04-30-2004 03:54 AM
I have a primary hpux 11.00 dns server with bind 4.9.7.
Now we have 2 new win2k DNS servers.
The HPUX server must refresh his records from the new 2 win2k servers.
How can I do this?
Thank you.
Regards...
PSS
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-30-2004 04:05 AM
04-30-2004 04:05 AM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
http://software.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=BIND9.2
Basically, you setup your HP=UX server to be a secondary for the zones you want to have from W2K servers....
Other points of reference:
http://www.isc.org
http://www.nominum.com/getOpenSourceResource.php?id=6
http://www.nominum.com/content/documents/bind9arm.pdf
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-02-2004 09:21 PM
05-02-2004 09:21 PM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
I need that this hpux 11.00 DNS bind 4.9.7 server must update all of the zones dinamically from the new Win2k DNS servers.
Is it possible and how?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-02-2004 10:10 PM
05-02-2004 10:10 PM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
if you refer to 'dynamic DNS' you really need to upgrade. 4.9.7 is too old for that.
Maybe it's better to move all DNS functionality to the new win2k servers (although I do not like that at all as Unix guy). Or cache-only?
JP.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2004 12:31 AM
05-03-2004 12:31 AM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2004 12:35 AM
05-03-2004 12:35 AM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
This Web page has a walk through on "configuring bind":
http://www.busan.edu/~nic/networking/tcpip/ch08_03.htm
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2004 12:43 AM
05-03-2004 12:43 AM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
windoze's w2k dynamic DNS is a diaster waiting to happen because it allows clients to update the DNS database on the fly. The windoze idiot(s) that came up with that one should be caned! I'm wondering how long it will take before someone writes a virsus/worm to exploit this! Nothing like not having a DNS server unavailable. Look here for help: http://wss.yale.edu/win2k/ad-and-ddns.html
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2004 07:21 PM
05-06-2004 07:21 PM
Re: Primary must update from new Win2k DNS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-07-2004 12:48 AM
05-07-2004 12:48 AM
SolutionYour named.boot:
;
; yourdomain.com secondary nameserver boot file.
;
directory /etc
secondary yourdomain.com AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD yourdomain.com.hosts
secondary BBB.AAA.IN-ADDR.ARPA AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD AAA.BBB.rev
primary 0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA named.local
cache . named.ca
AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD is ip address of Windows DNS Server
stop/start named
Here's another link for you to read:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x-087-2-resolv.named.html
Rgds...Geoff