- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Automated Backup
- >
- 1/9 Autoloader Backup Throughput
Automated Backup
1822144
Members
3289
Online
109640
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-11-2002 07:53 AM
тАО04-11-2002 07:53 AM
1/9 Autoloader Backup Throughput
I am using ARCserve 2000 with an HP 1/9 Autoloader (Ultrium) and an Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI adapter. Previously we had this system running on Windows NT 4.0 with all drives on hardware RAID 5. We were getting an average throughput of about 900 MB/min. Now we have installed Windows 2000 (freshly) on mirrored drives, with the rest of the system still on RAID 5. All of the rest of the hardware is the same. Now we are getting an average of 500-600 MB/ min. Any ideas on what might have caused this slowdown? Thanks in advance!
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2002 06:30 AM
тАО04-15-2002 06:30 AM
Re: 1/9 Autoloader Backup Throughput
Hi,
if your autoloader is an HVD drive this link can solve your problem:
http://ask.adaptec.com/cgi-bin/adaptec_tic.cfg/php/enduser/home.php
Reference # 990824-000002
If you have and LVD Drive, you have to change the scsi board with an Ultra160.
Bye
if your autoloader is an HVD drive this link can solve your problem:
http://ask.adaptec.com/cgi-bin/adaptec_tic.cfg/php/enduser/home.php
Reference # 990824-000002
If you have and LVD Drive, you have to change the scsi board with an Ultra160.
Bye
Everyone want be a councillor, Someone can councill, Only one produce
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-15-2002 08:05 AM
тАО05-15-2002 08:05 AM
Re: 1/9 Autoloader Backup Throughput
Brad,
The performance difference you are seeing could be many things. Changing to an Ultra160 card shouldn't change anything, I don't think your bottleneck is in the tape datapath. When you were running NT, what drive were you booting from, and now on 2k, what drive are you booting from? Where is your backup application installed, on the system disk, or the RAID? Is it the same hardware RAID you had on NT? I think the issue is related to your disk setup. It sounds like you've replaced the OS and the system disk(s), and the new setup is not as efficient. Even backing up the same data from the same hardware RAID device, if the application and OS are on a slower disk system than before, your performance will drop. Which brings up another point, are you comparing backup speeds of the system, or just the RAID device, and is the data the same as before?
-Barry Reider
The performance difference you are seeing could be many things. Changing to an Ultra160 card shouldn't change anything, I don't think your bottleneck is in the tape datapath. When you were running NT, what drive were you booting from, and now on 2k, what drive are you booting from? Where is your backup application installed, on the system disk, or the RAID? Is it the same hardware RAID you had on NT? I think the issue is related to your disk setup. It sounds like you've replaced the OS and the system disk(s), and the new setup is not as efficient. Even backing up the same data from the same hardware RAID device, if the application and OS are on a slower disk system than before, your performance will drop. Which brings up another point, are you comparing backup speeds of the system, or just the RAID device, and is the data the same as before?
-Barry Reider
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP