- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- EVA3000 performance
Disk Enclosures
1753481
Members
4160
Online
108794
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2007 03:23 AM
тАО03-22-2007 03:23 AM
EVA3000 performance
Hello,
We are seeing 17.5MB/s read performance on a 500GB RAID5 LUN on our EVA3000. We are barely using this array since we have only moved a handful of users to this system.
There are two disk cabinets and 16 spindles at 10K RPM and 300GB each, but we are only have 200GB of data on there so far.
We should be able to expect better data throughput than this ... shouldn't we?
Regards,
Darren
We are seeing 17.5MB/s read performance on a 500GB RAID5 LUN on our EVA3000. We are barely using this array since we have only moved a handful of users to this system.
There are two disk cabinets and 16 spindles at 10K RPM and 300GB each, but we are only have 200GB of data on there so far.
We should be able to expect better data throughput than this ... shouldn't we?
Regards,
Darren
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2007 03:52 AM
тАО03-22-2007 03:52 AM
Re: EVA3000 performance
You can use IOMETER/IOZONE to test the performance, because we don't know the test you used, for example, one copy is a single threaded operation, you can run multiple copies to obtain more transfer rate.
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2007 04:28 AM
тАО03-22-2007 04:28 AM
Re: EVA3000 performance
The MB/s is just one metric of performance.
Usually you use that for sequential, large block IOs (>64kB).
For transactional IO (usually in the 2 to 8kB range) the IO/s are much more important and actually the limitaion.
So we need to know what IOs you are measuring.
The rule of thumb says that you can have ~100 IO per disk in an array (without cache help) So with your 16 disks you can expect approximately 1600 IO/s which with 8kB blocks wold result in 12.8MB/s.
So, if you are in the 8kB range your 17.5MB/s are very good!!
Cheers
Peter
Usually you use that for sequential, large block IOs (>64kB).
For transactional IO (usually in the 2 to 8kB range) the IO/s are much more important and actually the limitaion.
So we need to know what IOs you are measuring.
The rule of thumb says that you can have ~100 IO per disk in an array (without cache help) So with your 16 disks you can expect approximately 1600 IO/s which with 8kB blocks wold result in 12.8MB/s.
So, if you are in the 8kB range your 17.5MB/s are very good!!
Cheers
Peter
I love storage
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-23-2007 03:33 AM
тАО03-23-2007 03:33 AM
Re: EVA3000 performance
Hello,
Thanks for your insights. I was able to get better throughput using multiple threads.
Regards,
Darren
Thanks for your insights. I was able to get better throughput using multiple threads.
Regards,
Darren
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP