- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Oracle Parallel Server
Operating System - HP-UX
1820270
Members
3262
Online
109622
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-02-2001 11:10 AM
05-02-2001 11:10 AM
Oracle Parallel Server
Anyone using it with HP-UX and FCAL to XP256 array?
Good reports?
Bad experiences?
Any "gotchas" with configuration?
We are looking for both (1) scalability and (2) reliability/fail-over.
Are there other (simpler/better) options? We don't need "five nines" (we *do* need 99.5 during prime shift) but we need an easy way to scale as performance needs grow. If this is "easy" and "robust" it would solve both problems at once.
Thanks!
Jim
Good reports?
Bad experiences?
Any "gotchas" with configuration?
We are looking for both (1) scalability and (2) reliability/fail-over.
Are there other (simpler/better) options? We don't need "five nines" (we *do* need 99.5 during prime shift) but we need an easy way to scale as performance needs grow. If this is "easy" and "robust" it would solve both problems at once.
Thanks!
Jim
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2001 12:46 AM
05-03-2001 12:46 AM
Re: Oracle Parallel Server
Hi there.
If possible, setup a high availability cluster.
Using Oracle Parallel server also costs extra money on licenses ( LOT OF MONEY ! ).
Install Oracle as a package on a cluster with switching enabled.
We have two N4000 configured as HA cluster with FC disk arrays. No problems so far.
If one nide fails, the software packages switch to the other.
Rgds
Alexander M. Ermes
If possible, setup a high availability cluster.
Using Oracle Parallel server also costs extra money on licenses ( LOT OF MONEY ! ).
Install Oracle as a package on a cluster with switching enabled.
We have two N4000 configured as HA cluster with FC disk arrays. No problems so far.
If one nide fails, the software packages switch to the other.
Rgds
Alexander M. Ermes
.. and all these memories are going to vanish like tears in the rain! final words from Rutger Hauer in "Blade Runner"
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP