- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Failover Solution on a Blade Server
Operating System - Linux
1820484
Members
2235
Online
109624
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-11-2007 10:54 AM
тАО12-11-2007 10:54 AM
Failover Solution on a Blade Server
We are seeking to use all 4 ports of the Blader Server. The first two ports on either side connect via datalink layer, but there is only 1 port connecting via network layer.
We have this connected via single cisco switch, but if this switch fails we have no connectivity to the server.
If we connect to another cisco switch using the 4th port, how should we handle redundancy while maintaining connectivity? Do we use a replicator of just connect to the 2nd cisco switch?
Now a single IP address for eth0 that is used will the switch know the connectivity that this NIC port failed and that it takes over the eth1 and the IP address doesn't change?
Eth0 and Eth0 cannot be bound with a single IP I supppose, what is the solution that the same IP remains or is there another way of doing this?
Please mail me.
Thanks
We have this connected via single cisco switch, but if this switch fails we have no connectivity to the server.
If we connect to another cisco switch using the 4th port, how should we handle redundancy while maintaining connectivity? Do we use a replicator of just connect to the 2nd cisco switch?
Now a single IP address for eth0 that is used will the switch know the connectivity that this NIC port failed and that it takes over the eth1 and the IP address doesn't change?
Eth0 and Eth0 cannot be bound with a single IP I supppose, what is the solution that the same IP remains or is there another way of doing this?
Please mail me.
Thanks
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-11-2007 11:42 AM
тАО12-11-2007 11:42 AM
Re: Failover Solution on a Blade Server
I suppose this could be called Teaming of the NIC ports. I suppose there is a solution to this.
Thanks
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-11-2007 01:47 PM
тАО12-11-2007 01:47 PM
Re: Failover Solution on a Blade Server
You need ethernet channel bonding. Please see:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/en-US/Reference_Guide/s2-networkscripts-interfaces-chan.html
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/en-US/Reference_Guide/s2-networkscripts-interfaces-chan.html
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-26-2007 02:32 PM
тАО12-26-2007 02:32 PM
Re: Failover Solution on a Blade Server
I worked on Ubuntu instead of Red Hat, got the system to team, it is working, will work on RH systems later.
Thanks
Thanks
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP