- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- Servers - General
- >
- Experience of HP IP KVM Switch
Servers - General
1821646
Members
2979
Online
109633
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-18-2003 07:40 AM
тАО06-18-2003 07:40 AM
Experience of HP IP KVM Switch
Hi
Has anyone got anything bad or good to say about the HP IP KVM Switch?
E.g. Distance limitations/ Bandwidth usage.
I'm particularly trying to compare it against the Avocet DSR4160
ScumbagAdie
Has anyone got anything bad or good to say about the HP IP KVM Switch?
E.g. Distance limitations/ Bandwidth usage.
I'm particularly trying to compare it against the Avocet DSR4160
ScumbagAdie
- Tags:
- KVM
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-12-2003 07:53 PM
тАО07-12-2003 07:53 PM
Re: Experience of HP IP KVM Switch
The HP IP KVM switch is made by Avocent. It look like the DSR2161 to me.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-05-2003 07:06 PM
тАО08-05-2003 07:06 PM
Re: Experience of HP IP KVM Switch
We purchased two 3 User IP KVM from HP and here are the limitations:
If you use the KVM hubs to increase the number of servers off a single KVM switch port, IP connectivity will not function for that port.
HP support confirmed this as the support functionality - pity the marketing doco isnt as forth comming. So be careful how you design your system. If the servers are directly connected to the switch then IP connectivity is ok.
The HP console IP viewer (separate application must be installed) is ok but slow even over 100Mbit FDX network. MS Terminal server is considerably faster.
Make sure you have the latest firmware for the switch and the expansion modules.
A nice enhancement would be for the KVM to support two monitors/keyboard. Although the IP is functional its not idea as a replacement for the local monitor (because of the the update time).
Phil Sharp
Improvements - multiple keyboard/monitor support, faster update time for the IP Viewer ,
direct web access rather than going through the application
If you use the KVM hubs to increase the number of servers off a single KVM switch port, IP connectivity will not function for that port.
HP support confirmed this as the support functionality - pity the marketing doco isnt as forth comming. So be careful how you design your system. If the servers are directly connected to the switch then IP connectivity is ok.
The HP console IP viewer (separate application must be installed) is ok but slow even over 100Mbit FDX network. MS Terminal server is considerably faster.
Make sure you have the latest firmware for the switch and the expansion modules.
A nice enhancement would be for the KVM to support two monitors/keyboard. Although the IP is functional its not idea as a replacement for the local monitor (because of the the update time).
Phil Sharp
Improvements - multiple keyboard/monitor support, faster update time for the IP Viewer ,
direct web access rather than going through the application
A scientist discovers that which exists. An engineer creates that which never was.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP