GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- Active/Active Site Failover - Anyone doing it?
StoreVirtual Storage
1850633
Members
3345
Online
104054
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Knowledge Base
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2010 08:55 AM
09-27-2010 08:55 AM
Active/Active Site Failover - Anyone doing it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3VpfesM8A
I've been looking at SAN/storage options and have been thinking very much in terms of "Live" and "Backup" sites. Both our locations are around 3/4 of a mile apart linked by 1 or 10gig ethernet (the fibre will take 10gig so it comes down to cost and necessity).
I'm now thinking why on earth wouldn't I want to go active/active if we're looking at Lefthand? I'm hoping to have them in next week to discuss options.
I'm a little blown away by that video tbh as it's not using expensive license options.
Appreciate any thoughts on whether vSphere's FT really is good enough that you'd be content with (for example):
Primary Site:
ESX Host
P4000
Single Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)
Secondary Site:
ESX Host
P4000
Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)
I've been looking at SAN/storage options and have been thinking very much in terms of "Live" and "Backup" sites. Both our locations are around 3/4 of a mile apart linked by 1 or 10gig ethernet (the fibre will take 10gig so it comes down to cost and necessity).
I'm now thinking why on earth wouldn't I want to go active/active if we're looking at Lefthand? I'm hoping to have them in next week to discuss options.
I'm a little blown away by that video tbh as it's not using expensive license options.
Appreciate any thoughts on whether vSphere's FT really is good enough that you'd be content with (for example):
Primary Site:
ESX Host
P4000
Single Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)
Secondary Site:
ESX Host
P4000
Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP