- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Virtual Connect: 802.1q tunneling to ESX with fail...
BladeSystem - General
1821456
Members
2868
Online
109633
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-30-2009 09:07 AM
06-30-2009 09:07 AM
Virtual Connect: 802.1q tunneling to ESX with failover
I've read the cookbook and manuals over and over and I don't see how to accomplish this.
Where this all get’s confusing is in the fact that we have four VC modules, and would like to maintain some failover. This section of the “VC user guide\Connecting Virtual Connect Ethernet module Uplinks” (page 48):
Mapping multiple networks to a shared uplink port set:
It is also possible to map multiple VLAN-tagged networks to a set of shared uplink ports. The resulting shared uplink port set allows for the minimum number of cables while still providing for link aggregation and failover.
In the following example, a shared uplink port set is first defined to provide aggregation and failover.
Shared_Uplink_Set_A = {Enclosure1:Bay1:PortX2, Enclosure1:Bay2:PortX2}
To me this means that I can aggregate four ports on VC_1 and four on VC_2 and have failover should one switch or one VC module fail. But we would ideally want to pass the tags to ESX and use ESX 802.1q VLAN tagging to support network assignment. Since this prevents having to statically (physically in the blade center) a VLAN to a blades NIC.
But later on in the manual this appears:
“Network Management” (page 118) :
When the 'Tunnel VLAN Tags' option is selected on the Ethernet Settings (Advanced Settings) screen (on page 115) or the 'Enable VLAN Tunneling' option is selected on the Define Ethernet Network screen (on page 103), server VLAN tagging is only supported on networks with dedicated uplinks, and it cannot be used with shared uplink sets.
This to me means that we cannot tunnel the 802.1q trunk to ESX if we intend to have a failover trunk?
Ideally we would want to have four channels bonded on each of the two VC's, four bonded and active on VC_1 tunneling the 802.1q trunk to the ESX blades. Four bonded and standby on VC_2.
Is this just not possible?
Where this all get’s confusing is in the fact that we have four VC modules, and would like to maintain some failover. This section of the “VC user guide\Connecting Virtual Connect Ethernet module Uplinks” (page 48):
Mapping multiple networks to a shared uplink port set:
It is also possible to map multiple VLAN-tagged networks to a set of shared uplink ports. The resulting shared uplink port set allows for the minimum number of cables while still providing for link aggregation and failover.
In the following example, a shared uplink port set is first defined to provide aggregation and failover.
Shared_Uplink_Set_A = {Enclosure1:Bay1:PortX2, Enclosure1:Bay2:PortX2}
To me this means that I can aggregate four ports on VC_1 and four on VC_2 and have failover should one switch or one VC module fail. But we would ideally want to pass the tags to ESX and use ESX 802.1q VLAN tagging to support network assignment. Since this prevents having to statically (physically in the blade center) a VLAN to a blades NIC.
But later on in the manual this appears:
“Network Management” (page 118) :
When the 'Tunnel VLAN Tags' option is selected on the Ethernet Settings (Advanced Settings) screen (on page 115) or the 'Enable VLAN Tunneling' option is selected on the Define Ethernet Network screen (on page 103), server VLAN tagging is only supported on networks with dedicated uplinks, and it cannot be used with shared uplink sets.
This to me means that we cannot tunnel the 802.1q trunk to ESX if we intend to have a failover trunk?
Ideally we would want to have four channels bonded on each of the two VC's, four bonded and active on VC_1 tunneling the 802.1q trunk to the ESX blades. Four bonded and standby on VC_2.
Is this just not possible?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP