Comware Based
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

comware and procurve bridge-aggregation vlan noobie question

SOLVED
Go to solution
kitkatneko
Occasional Contributor

comware and procurve bridge-aggregation vlan noobie question

Hi there. I probably missed a post with the answer when I searched for this but here I go.

 

Background, I am used to procurve and now made the move to a new comware based core.

 

My previous setup was a procruve connected to another procurve with LACP trunks with all vlan tagged on the trunk.

 

The new setup with which I am having an issue is a procurve and comware connected to another with LACP.

 

The trunk conf on procurve is straight forward:

trunk J1-J4 trk60 lacp

then this trk60 is tagged in each vlan of interest (1,99,100).

 

The bridge aggregation on comware is also ok:

interface Bridge-Aggregation10
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
link-aggregation mode dynamic

 

And the interfaces of interest are in the bagg accordingly

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/10
 port link-mode bridge
 port link-type trunk
 port trunk permit vlan all
 port link-aggregation group 10

 

You will note I am doing permit vlan all too.

 

On the procurve, my LACP looks good.

          LACP      Trunk     Port                LACP      Admin   Oper
   Port   Enabled   Group     Status    Partner   Status    Key     Key
   ----   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   ------  ------
   J1     Active    Trk60     Up        Yes       Success   0        349
   J2     Active    Trk60     Up        Yes       Success   0        349
   J3     Active    Trk60     Up        Yes       Success   0        349
   J4     Active    Trk60     Up        Yes       Success   0        349

 

On the comware, my BAGG also looks good

Loadsharing Type: Shar -- Loadsharing, NonS -- Non-Loadsharing
Port Status: S -- Selected, U -- Unselected
Flags:  A -- LACP_Activity, B -- LACP_Timeout, C -- Aggregation,
        D -- Synchronization, E -- Collecting, F -- Distributing,
        G -- Defaulted, H -- Expired

Aggregation Interface: Bridge-Aggregation10
Aggregation Mode: Dynamic
Loadsharing Type: Shar
System ID: 0x8000, 7848-5952-8f88
Local:
  Port             Status  Priority Oper-Key  Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GE1/0/10         S       32768    1         {ACDEF}
  GE1/0/11         S       32768    1         {ACDEF}
  GE2/0/10         S       32768    1         {ACDEF}
  GE2/0/11         S       32768    1         {ACDEF}
Remote:
  Actor            Partner Priority Oper-Key  SystemID               Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GE1/0/10         217     0        349       0xcf00, 0018-71ca-cf00 {ACDEF}
  GE1/0/11         219     0        349       0xcf00, 0018-71ca-cf00 {ACDEF}
  GE2/0/10         218     0        349       0xcf00, 0018-71ca-cf00 {ACDEF}
  GE2/0/11         220     0        349       0xcf00, 0018-71ca-cf00 {ACDEF}

 

however...

 

While everything connected on my procurve untagged on vlan 99 and 100 is fine and reach the comware, what is untagged on vlan 1 doesn't.

 

now I perhaps lack comprehension of comware but here is what I think.

 

on comware, if I look at vlan 99 and 100 I see that the BAGG (and the member ports) is tagged.

>dis vlan 100
 VLAN ID: 100
 VLAN Type: static
 Route Interface: not configured
 Description: VLAN 0100
 Name: 100-servers
 Tagged   Ports:
    Bridge-Aggregation10
    GigabitEthernet1/0/10    GigabitEthernet1/0/11    GigabitEthernet2/0/10
    GigabitEthernet2/0/11
    Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/29
    Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/30
    Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/29
    Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/30
 Untagged Ports: none

 

but on vlan 1 the BAGG is untagged.

>dis vlan 1
 VLAN ID: 1
 VLAN Type: static
 Route Interface: not configured
 Description: VLAN 0001
 Name: leg-1-mgmt
 Tagged   Ports: none
 Untagged Ports:
    Bridge-Aggregation10
    GigabitEthernet1/0/1     GigabitEthernet1/0/2     GigabitEthernet1/0/3
    GigabitEthernet1/0/4     GigabitEthernet1/0/5     GigabitEthernet1/0/6
    GigabitEthernet1/0/7     GigabitEthernet1/0/8     GigabitEthernet1/0/9
    GigabitEthernet1/0/10    GigabitEthernet1/0/11    GigabitEthernet1/0/12
    GigabitEthernet1/0/13    GigabitEthernet1/0/14    GigabitEthernet1/0/15
    GigabitEthernet1/0/16    GigabitEthernet1/0/17    GigabitEthernet1/0/18
    GigabitEthernet1/0/19    GigabitEthernet1/0/20    GigabitEthernet1/0/21
    GigabitEthernet1/0/22    GigabitEthernet1/0/23    GigabitEthernet1/0/24
    GigabitEthernet1/0/25    GigabitEthernet1/0/26    GigabitEthernet1/0/27
    GigabitEthernet1/0/28    GigabitEthernet2/0/1     GigabitEthernet2/0/2
    GigabitEthernet2/0/3     GigabitEthernet2/0/4     GigabitEthernet2/0/5
    GigabitEthernet2/0/6     GigabitEthernet2/0/7     GigabitEthernet2/0/8
    GigabitEthernet2/0/9     GigabitEthernet2/0/10    GigabitEthernet2/0/11
    GigabitEthernet2/0/12    GigabitEthernet2/0/13    GigabitEthernet2/0/14
    GigabitEthernet2/0/15    GigabitEthernet2/0/16    GigabitEthernet2/0/17
    GigabitEthernet2/0/18    GigabitEthernet2/0/19    GigabitEthernet2/0/20
    GigabitEthernet2/0/21    GigabitEthernet2/0/22    GigabitEthernet2/0/23
    GigabitEthernet2/0/24    GigabitEthernet2/0/25    GigabitEthernet2/0/26
    GigabitEthernet2/0/27    GigabitEthernet2/0/28

 

so here I go, the issue seem to be that I have a BAGG with port-link mode trunk that is untagged? hence not getting my vlan 1 traffic from the procurve? if so how do I "tagged" my BAGG on vlan1?

 

or perhaps I am mixing up the terms and miss something because when I had only procurve, this conf with the lacp trunk tagged on all vlans it did not require much more config.

 

3 REPLIES
sdide
Respected Contributor
Solution

Re: comware and procurve bridge-aggregation vlan noobie question

Hi Kitkatneko,

 

I think you need to explicitly set another pvid. Otherwise vlan1 will be pvid. (untagged)

 

so on your bagg do :

 

port trunk pvid <some vlan you do not use>

 

Then vlan 1 will not be untagged.

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

 

Søren Dideriksen, Network Administrator
Region Midtjylland
darylwan
Occasional Advisor

Re: comware and procurve bridge-aggregation vlan noobie question

I agree, native vlan/PVID is untagged in Comware 802.Q trunk ports.

You will need to set to another PVID if you want VLAN 1 to be tagged.

 

Daryl

kitkatneko
Occasional Contributor

Re: comware and procurve bridge-aggregation vlan noobie question

I indeed totaly missed the PVID part.

 

As mentioned I have changed the PVID of my BAGG and it automagically got tagged under the allowed vlan.

 

Thank you.