- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- Disk Enclosures
- >
- IBM ESS fc20 (shark)
Disk Enclosures
1756339
Members
3314
Online
108846
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-21-2001 11:30 AM
09-21-2001 11:30 AM
I am looking for any info. on the performance of the "shark" on an HP-UX 11 N class using Fiber channels. I have used the EMC 8430 as a point of referance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-25-2001 05:01 AM
09-25-2001 05:01 AM
Solution
Here's the numbers from HP's R&D labs in Roseville:
Shark F20:
Seq reads from disk: 350MB/s
100% cache hit 4K reads: 41,000 IOPS
random reads 0% cache hit: 11,000 IOPS
Compared to an XP512:
seq reads from disk: 842MB/s
100 cache hit 4K read: 165,011 IOPS
random reads 0% cache hit: 30,924 IOPS
So, that makes the Shark about 1/3 of the performance of an XP512.
I hope you're getting it for 1/3 the price!!!
Good luck
Shark F20:
Seq reads from disk: 350MB/s
100% cache hit 4K reads: 41,000 IOPS
random reads 0% cache hit: 11,000 IOPS
Compared to an XP512:
seq reads from disk: 842MB/s
100 cache hit 4K read: 165,011 IOPS
random reads 0% cache hit: 30,924 IOPS
So, that makes the Shark about 1/3 of the performance of an XP512.
I hope you're getting it for 1/3 the price!!!
Good luck
No matter where you go, there you are.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP