Simpler Navigation for Servers and Operating Systems - Please Update Your Bookmarks
Completed: a much simpler Servers and Operating Systems section of the Community. We combined many of the older boards, so you won't have to click through so many levels to get at the information you need. Check the consolidated boards here as many sub-forums are now single boards.
If you have bookmarked forums or discussion boards in Servers and Operating Systems, we suggest you check and update them as needed.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Oracle 9i

Rothery Harris
Trusted Contributor

Oracle 9i

I am installing Oracle 9i on an HP9000 L2000 system running HP-UX 11.i. As part of the installation a database is created. This ran for 3hrs and was making no progress. I TCs and submitted the memory dump and basically the system was frantically paging memory. We could not even 'ping' the system. We are installing the 64bit version of Oracle 9i. On creating a samplae database it still seems very slow.
The system has 512Mb of memory.
Thierry Poels_1
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i


HPUX 11i + Oracle 9i 64bit with 512MB RAM? might be nice as a development server, but I would plug in a few more GBs if you plan to have some users on this system: Oracle requires memory, lots of it;

All unix flavours are exactly the same . . . . . . . . . . for end users anyway.
Stefan Farrelly
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

512Mb of RAM is very low for an Oracle database server. What do Oracle recommend for 9i ? I think its more than 512Mb.

Have you got sufficient device swap setup ? (at least 512Mb).
What is your buffer cache set to ? (sysdef | grep dbc) With so little memory you should set dbc_min_pct to 0 and dbc_max_pct to 2.
Im from Palmerston North, New Zealand, but somehow ended up in London...
Alexander M. Ermes
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

Hi there.
Check the Oracle Installation guide in Oracle Technet.

I can only suggest the same thing as the others. Add some more memory to your server.
You will also have to change some kernel parameters to get Oracle running.
Check it in the Oracle documentation.
Did you receive the CD set ?
There should be one cd with the complete documentation as well.
Alexander M. Ermes
.. and all these memories are going to vanish like tears in the rain! final words from Rutger Hauer in "Blade Runner"
Occasional Visitor

Re: Oracle 9i

I can confirm the memory issue. I did successfully install Oracle 9.0.1 on my L3000 (3GB Mem, HP-UX 11i Server). When I tried to do the same on my B2000 (512 MB Mem, HP-UX 11i Workstation) I got the same behaviour even after I configured 2GB additional filesystem swap. Glance told me, the system ran out of available memory. I added another 512MB on the B2000 and was able to install.
This means, that the Java Oracle Installer itself needs at least 512MB mem.
Peter Kloetgen
Esteemed Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

Hi Rothery,

first of all to say, you definetely need more RAM to get this to work properly. Also think over some kernel parameters. Here some, which you should look for....

- swapmem_on = 1
- shmmax = (1024*1024*1024)

- dbc_max_pct <= 25
- shmmni > 500
- semmns > 500
- semmns > 2000
- nfile > 4000
- nproc > 1000
- nkthreads > 4000
- maxfiles > 100
- maxuproc > 500
- max_thread_proc > 256

Oracle "init*ora" values:

db_block_size >= 8192
db_block_buffers >= 100000
db_files >= 100
shared_pool_size >= 100MB
log_buffer_size >= 512KB
sort_area_size >= 4MB
sort_area_retained_size >= 1MB
sessions >= 100
processes >= 100
dml_locks >= 1000
db_block_size * db_file_multiblock_read_count = 64KB
log_archive_start = true

This is *not* the correct configuration for each environment, just some advice where to look for.

Allways stay on the bright side of life!

I'm learning here as well as helping
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i


512 MB is sufficient for oracle, Have you set the kernel parameters before starting the installation.

check at this URL:
never give up
T G Manikandan
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

During your installation the option of creating a database can be neglected.
The database creation during that time has a lot of options like the Jserver,etc which takes a long time and consumes lot of memory.Also the Oracle installtion process itself uses more memory.
THe best would be to cancel the creation of database and create it using the command line using the create database method on svrmgrl prompt.
Else also you can avoid certain options when you are creating the database when you are using the GUI method during installation.
You can see these options during,
when you run the $ORACLE_HOME/bin/dbassist
to create the database.
The best one is to stop creation of sample database during installation.

Neil Harris
Regular Advisor

Re: Oracle 9i

We are running 9i on a 2000 with no problems its does though have 3Gbytes of ram in it. T G Manikandan sugest using svrmgrl to create a database, "big shock!" svrmgrl does not exist in 9i.
To get its functonality which is much reduced you use sqlplus look on metalink for details. Oracle are now expecting you to use OEM for database management. I do though support his idea of delaying dbase creation till after the install. The prefered method in 9i is to use the database creation assistant. Also I know its a pain in the neck but have you worked completely through the installation guide. 9i has a great expectation that the platform is properly set up before installing it. Particularly the HPUX tuneable parameters using the pre defined dbase ones is no use.
An inveterate hacker
Rothery Harris
Trusted Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

Thanks to everyone. We have no ordered 1GB more memory.

R. Allan Hicks
Trusted Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

I'm running 9i on HPUX 11.00. I have 1Gbyte of ram and I get into some memory crunch problems too and I'm not in production yet. So, I'm still tuning memory and begging managment for 'a little more please' ( I get the same reaction as oliver twist did).

Two other footnotes:

I started with 9.0.1 and as one would suspect I had a lot of trouble with it. Especially dbca (database creation assistant). I finally got it to generate the installation scripts so I could tweak them. I'm on and the dbca appears to be a lot better.

Also, I believe one of the other respondents meantioned it, and I would like to add support to the installation of Jserver. I have had some experience with 8.1.7 and 9.0.1. The java pool needs to be on the high side of what Oracle recommends. I had a guy in a newsgroup recommend that I take Oracle's recommendation and double it. So far, he appears to be right.

Good Luck
"Only he who attempts the absurd is capable of achieving the impossible
Bill Hassell
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

Although gigabytes of RAM is not inexpensive, the alternative is unusable performance. Oracle requires gigabytes of RAM to perform well. Less than 1Gb and yes, Oracle can be coaxed to run but queries can take minutes, even hours. Oracle is not cheap so it is amazing that IT management would choose to cripple this very expensive program with too little RAM.

If you are considering Oracle, don't accept anything smaller than 2Gb for 32bit versions of Oracle, and 4Gb (or larger) for 64bit versions. Management may say "We'll make it work" but the reality is that minimally acceptable performance is not possible with less than 1Gb of RAM. And the sysadmin gets the blame because there should be some "magic" kernel parameter will make Oracle run faster with inadequate RAM.

Bill Hassell, sysadmin
Patrick Wallek
Honored Contributor

Re: Oracle 9i

Check this out from Kingston:

A 2GB Kit for an L2000 is $1,215 (US dollars). That is pretty darn reasonable if you ask me. I would go with Bill Hassell's recommendation and add at least 4GB to this machine ($2,430 US). I think you would be VERY pleased with the performance once you add that amount of RAM.