HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- MSA Storage
- >
- XP10000 Performance Problems
MSA Storage
1829107
Members
2808
Online
109986
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-21-2007 09:02 PM
08-21-2007 09:02 PM
XP10000 Performance Problems
Hi,
we want to migrate our main database from XP128 SANs to XP10000. Our developers has written a test pl/sql script, which tests a tablespace which resides on only one RAID Group (4 HDDs, Raid 5 3D+1P). On XP128, I need about 44sec, on XP10000 I need 53sec, which means, the new XP10000 is about 15% slower.
What are we doing wrong, why is XP10000 slower than XP128.
Both tests are made with no clients connected except the test machine.
Another mystery is that testtool says a striped lvol residing on two raidgroups has the same throughput than a lvol residing on only one Raidgroup (raw devices measured).
Can anybody please help me ?
Thanks
bk-ffm.de
we want to migrate our main database from XP128 SANs to XP10000. Our developers has written a test pl/sql script, which tests a tablespace which resides on only one RAID Group (4 HDDs, Raid 5 3D+1P). On XP128, I need about 44sec, on XP10000 I need 53sec, which means, the new XP10000 is about 15% slower.
What are we doing wrong, why is XP10000 slower than XP128.
Both tests are made with no clients connected except the test machine.
Another mystery is that testtool says a striped lvol residing on two raidgroups has the same throughput than a lvol residing on only one Raidgroup (raw devices measured).
Can anybody please help me ?
Thanks
bk-ffm.de
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP