sendmail error

[Steven Schweda]

> ROUTE_GATEWAY[0]=192.168.0.1

And who is this guy, and what is his netmask?
(And what are his routes?)

[Prashantj]

Hi,

This HP-UX is test server.

i am using same netmask for mailserver 192.168.0.6. & i am sending this mail to same prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com


Prashant

[Steven Schweda]

> i am using same netmask for mailserver
> 192.168.0.6.

Evidence?

> & i am sending this mail to same
> prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com

But that should go to a real-world address,
not to some 192.168.x.x address, shouldn't
it?

ALP $ nslookup -type=mx rahejauniversal.com
[...]
mail exchanger = mail.rahejauniversal.com
[...]
mail.rahejauniversal.com internet address = 66.36.230.233
[...]

Between the questions which you haven't
answered and the answers which you have
given, I'm not sure which of us is more
confused.

[Prashantj]

Hi,

# nslookup -type=mx rahejauniversal.com
Using /etc/hosts on: ruleccdev

looking up FILES
*** No address information is available for "rahejauniversal.com"

This HP-UX system in same lan, internet address is require for that ?

Prashant

[nightwich]

Hi Prashantj



I think your real problem is with the comunication with mail server.



So try and paste the output of:


ping " name_of_the_mail_server"


ping " ip_of_the_mail_server "


ping " your gateway " -> ping 192.168.0.1


Regards

[Prashantj]

Hi,

OUTPUT

# ping krumail.kraheja.info
PING exchange: 64 byte packets
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=3. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=4. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=5. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=6. time=0. ms

----exchange PING Statistics----
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/0
# ping 192.168.0.6
PING 192.168.0.6: 64 byte packets
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=3. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=4. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=5. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.6: icmp_seq=6. time=0. ms

----192.168.0.6 PING Statistics----
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/0
[HP-UX @ruleccdev]# ping 192.168.0.1
PING 192.168.0.1: 64 byte packets
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3. time=0. ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4. time=0. ms

----192.168.0.1 PING Statistics----
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/0
#

[nightwich]

Ok so no problem with network


put the output of the following


#cd /etc/mail
#grep -i DS sendmail.cf

#mailq

Regards

[Prashantj]

Hi,

[HP-UX @ruleccdev]# grep -i DS sendmail.cf
##### in /ux/inet3/inet3isu/Sendmail/Sendmail-8.13.1/cmnds/src/cf/cf
##### environment may be needed. HP recommends that #####
# o UseTLS : Enable the TLS handshake in the SMTP transaction. (True/False) #
# to users at the clients. You could have nameserver MX records #
# database rebuilds, and various errors. More detailed information #
# Try hosts with no MX records (option TryNullMXList): #
# Sendmail always tries to lookup MX records for the destination host #
# number). If there are no MX records listed for the host or we are #
# Relay all non-local mail to the "Smart" relay host (DS) via smtp: #
# to a smart relay via SMTP just set macro S (DS) to the name of the #
# Relay all non-local mail to the "Smart" relay host (DS) via UUCP: #
# make two chnages to this file. First, set macro S (DS) to the name #
# This needs to be set before any LDAP maps are defined. `localhost' must be #
DSkrumail.kraheja.info
O OldStyleHeaders=True
# noreceipts Don't return success DSN's
# perform initial split of envelope without checking MX records
#O Timeout.queuereturn.dsn=5d
#O Timeout.queuewarn.dsn=4h
# Return-Receipt-To: header implies DSN request
#O RrtImpliesDsn=False
# DHParameters (only required if DSA/DH is used)
RSOFTWARE $#error $@ 4.7.0 $: "403 TLS handshake."
Mdsmtp, P=[IPC], F=mDFMuXa%, S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP, R=EnvToSMTP, E=\r\n, L=990,

[HP-UX @ruleccdev]# grep -i DS sendmail.cf
##### in /ux/inet3/inet3isu/Sendmail/Sendmail-8.13.1/cmnds/src/cf/cf
##### environment may be needed. HP recommends that #####
# o UseTLS : Enable the TLS handshake in the SMTP transaction. (True/False) #
# to users at the clients. You could have nameserver MX records #
# database rebuilds, and various errors. More detailed information #
# Try hosts with no MX records (option TryNullMXList): #
# Sendmail always tries to lookup MX records for the destination host #
# number). If there are no MX records listed for the host or we are #
# Relay all non-local mail to the "Smart" relay host (DS) via smtp: #
# to a smart relay via SMTP just set macro S (DS) to the name of the #
# Relay all non-local mail to the "Smart" relay host (DS) via UUCP: #
# make two chnages to this file. First, set macro S (DS) to the name #
# This needs to be set before any LDAP maps are defined. `localhost' must be #
DSkrumail.kraheja.info
O OldStyleHeaders=True
# noreceipts Don't return success DSN's
# perform initial split of envelope without checking MX records
#O Timeout.queuereturn.dsn=5d
#O Timeout.queuewarn.dsn=4h
# Return-Receipt-To: header implies DSN request
#O RrtImpliesDsn=False
# DHParameters (only required if DSA/DH is used)
RSOFTWARE $#error $@ 4.7.0 $: "403 TLS handshake."
Mdsmtp, P=[IPC], F=mDFMuXa%, S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP, R=EnvToSMTP, E=\r\n, L=990,
[HP-UX @ruleccdev]# mailq
/var/spool/mqueue (9 requests)
-----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- ------------Sender/Recipient-----------
o7697e7h024261 0 Fri Aug 6 14:37 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o76Bf9Bp011173 25 Fri Aug 6 17:11 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o76Behaj011123 25 Fri Aug 6 17:10 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o76A4k7N000653 25 Fri Aug 6 15:34 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o76A2gOq000455 146 Fri Aug 6 15:32 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o7699ZNb024461 146 Fri Aug 6 14:39 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o76988ln024314 146 Fri Aug 6 14:38 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o768sr2X022828 146 Fri Aug 6 14:24 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
o768rSDR022691 146 Fri Aug 6 14:23 root
(host map: lookup (rahejauniversal.com): deferred)
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
Total requests: 9


Prashant

[nightwich]

ok


know put the output of the following output:



ls | sendmail -v "valid_email_adrress"



Also assign some points to usefull answers ..

Regards.

[Prashantj]

HI,

[HP-UX @ruleccdev]# ls | sendmail -v prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com
rahejauniversal.com: Name server timeout
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com... Transient parse error -- message queued for future delivery
prashant.jadhav@rahejauniversal.com... queued


Definitely i will assign the points.

Prashant