- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Network Simulator
- >
- Sub-interface on Route-Aggregation possible>?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2019 03:44 AM - edited 09-09-2019 03:45 AM
09-09-2019 03:44 AM - edited 09-09-2019 03:45 AM
Sub-interface on Route-Aggregation possible>?
I`m testing a POC to replace the L2 bridge-interface to L3 Route-Aggregation.
Like this:
#
interface Route-Aggregation1
description RA-To-->SiteA
link-aggregation mode dynamic
#
interface Route-Aggregation1.10
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
vlan-type dot1q vid 10
ospf cost 60
#
interface Route-Aggregation1.20
ip address 20.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
vlan-type dot1q vid 20
ospf cost 60
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0
port link-mode route
port link-aggregation group 1
#
I`m not getting this to work.
Ports are up.
with LLDP I can see the neighbor swith
Is this a licence thing (Running trail)
I`m Running HPE VSR1000 in GNS3
Feature: STANDARD
Product Description: HP VSR1008 Comware 7 Virtual Services Router E-LTU
License Type: Trial (days restricted)
Greetings
Palermo
IP addresses are fictional.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2019 05:37 AM
09-09-2019 05:37 AM
Re: Sub-interface on Route-Aggregation possible>?
I don't understand...why configuring a Link Aggregation Group (Dynamic = LACP) if just one physical interface is made member of it? what's the reason? Technically speaking a LAG can be made a routed (logical) interface...exactly as a single physical interface can.
I'm not an HPE Employee
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2019 09:21 PM - edited 09-10-2019 09:27 PM
09-10-2019 09:21 PM - edited 09-10-2019 09:27 PM
Re: Sub-interface on Route-Aggregation possible>?
Hi,
That is a good observation, Thanks for help thinking out loud
The real situation is we are having 2 ten-gig Dark-fiber. with multiple VPN-instances.
When I connect 2 interfaces to the interface Route-Aggregation1 with ip addresses it all works like a charmed. But using sub-interfaces underneath the Route-Aggregation1 the ports are in the up-state but no bit is traveling over the line. I can not find anything on the inet that helps.
Hope someone can help me.
Greetings
Palermo