Sub-interface on Route-Aggregation possible>?

[Palermo]

I`m testing a POC to replace the L2 bridge-interface to L3 Route-Aggregation.
Like this:
#
interface Route-Aggregation1
description RA-To-->SiteA
link-aggregation mode dynamic
#
interface Route-Aggregation1.10
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
vlan-type dot1q vid 10
ospf cost 60
#
interface Route-Aggregation1.20
ip address 20.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
vlan-type dot1q vid 20
ospf cost 60
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0
port link-mode route
port link-aggregation group 1
#

I`m not getting this to work.
Ports are up. 
with LLDP I can see the neighbor swith
Is this a licence thing (Running trail)
I`m Running HPE VSR1000 in GNS3
Feature: STANDARD
Product Description: HP VSR1008 Comware 7 Virtual Services Router E-LTU
License Type: Trial (days restricted)

Greetings

Palermo

IP addresses are fictional.

[parnassus]

I don't understand...why configuring a Link Aggregation Group (Dynamic = LACP) if just one physical interface is made member of it? what's the reason? Technically speaking a LAG can be made a routed (logical) interface...exactly as a single physical interface can.

[Palermo]

Hi,

That is a good observation, Thanks for help thinking out loud
The real situation is we are having 2 ten-gig Dark-fiber. with multiple VPN-instances.
When I connect 2 interfaces to the interface Route-Aggregation1 with ip addresses it all works like a charmed. But using sub-interfaces underneath the Route-Aggregation1 the ports are in the up-state but no bit is traveling over the line. I can not find anything on the inet that helps.

Hope someone can help me.

Greetings
Palermo