- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: LAN failover
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-15-2004 12:22 AM
тАО05-15-2004 12:22 AM
Re: LAN failover
LAT can work on two different interfaces. See:
$ mcr latcp help create link example
If you have multiple interfaces and want to use only on of them, but LAT selects the wrong one by default, I think you can control this with the logical name LAT$DEVICE
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-15-2004 01:45 PM
тАО05-15-2004 01:45 PM
Re: LAN failover
you really should consider the DNS path. Since your network setup must be pretty static (else the solution with the hosts file would not work at all ;-), setting up DNS is mostly a one time effort with very low maitenance. This should be easier to achieve than to re certify all your applications for another release. You can easily run the DNS server on one of your VMS boxes, but also for VMS to act as a client only works fine.
Greetings, Martin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-27-2004 12:01 AM
тАО05-27-2004 12:01 AM
Re: LAN failover
Maybe a little late, but what the heck...
TCPIP 5.4 has FailSAFE IP in it, which does exactly what you want to. If you can't install it, maybe you can use the principle to build something yourself.
Failsafe IP compares the send and receive buffers. If the send buffers are increasing, and the receive buffers are not, (wihtin -default- 5 sec) the interface is disabled, and the spare interface is enabled.
Hope this helps..
Bob.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-27-2004 01:55 AM
тАО05-27-2004 01:55 AM
SolutionThe easiest way is to create a clusteralias over both networkcards. So every card has it's own IP adres, and create a IP clusteralias over both NIC-cards. The user connects to the clusteralias and if one card fails (the impersonator) the otherone is without notice taking over the conrtol. This is supported on youre versions. So you can implement this very easaly whitout upgrading anything ! I've tested this. When you're connected to the machine over IP, and remove the networkcable to the impersonator(to make sure this card creates a failure :-) ! ) you don't even know there was a failure because everything works fine and you do not lose youre connect (even by moving to another NIC !!). So every node on my cluster has 2 NIC-cards, an every node has a cluster alias. Sounds wheard, but is working fine. I do not have a cluste alias for the whole cluster. This is done by round-robin over the clusteraliasses.
AvR
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-27-2004 02:51 AM
тАО05-27-2004 02:51 AM
Re: LAN failover
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-27-2004 10:24 PM
тАО05-27-2004 10:24 PM
Re: LAN failover
the solution of Anton van Ruitenbeek really is a good one. You can compare it with a dual host cluster. There you also have two network cards but by creating a cluster alias this looks virtually like one machine.
Marc
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-27-2004 10:37 PM
тАО05-27-2004 10:37 PM
Re: LAN failover
- « Previous
- Next »