- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Languages and SDLN
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-07-2007 09:12 AM
тАО04-07-2007 09:12 AM
Languages and SDLN
Right now, if you upgrade OpenVMS without reinstalling your language-specific STARLET definitions, you risk an out-of-date object.
Given the extraordinary performance of OpenVMS compilers (I remember RSX compiles and TKBs that took all day), I don't think the added burden would be significant.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-07-2007 11:33 AM
тАО04-07-2007 11:33 AM
Re: Languages and SDLN
What is SDLN?
OpenVMS had 2 language independend data languages that I know:
CDDL = The CDD Language
SDL = Structure Datadefintion Language?
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/freeware/freeware60/sdl/freeware_readme.txt
VMS Enigneering used SDL for its work.
Customers were supposed to usec CDDL in a VIA environment.
>> I wonder if it'd really be all that difficult to include SDLN parser code into the various compilers so that include directives referencing STARLET or LIB pulled their definitions from a language independent reference which tracked the executive.
The compiler folks foudn they often needed little tweaks to make it really work. The bulk translation worked just fine, but some details needed polishing.
Also, while the virtues of resusable code where touted, it wasn't fully followed. The fiefdoms did not help: VMS, RTL, CTL, TLE
I thinkk the latter two stood for
Commercial Tools and Languages (Cobol, Basic...)
and
Technical Language Environment (Fortran, Pascal,...)
>> Right now, if you upgrade OpenVMS without reinstalling your language-specific STARLET definitions, you risk an out-of-date object.
Following the various release notes / read me's and such seems to be enough to control the problem.
With the level of changes to be expected over the next few year it's clearly a non-problem IMHO.
>> I remember RSX compiles and TKBs that took all day
One of the RSX guys (McCarthy? Todd Schoeller?) had a sign on his (then ZK) cubicle wall along the lines of "The Taskbuilber is extra slow on Thursdays"
I just loved ODL files. It was so easy to be the one-eyed king in the land of blind!
Thanks for bringing back the memories ;-)
Hope this helps some,
Hein van den Heuvel (at gmail dot com)
HvdH Performance Consulting
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-08-2007 07:41 AM
тАО04-08-2007 07:41 AM
Re: Languages and SDLN
"> SET /COFFEEBREAK ! Go have some coffee"
"> SET /NOCOFFEEBREAK ! Time to get back to work"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-08-2007 07:43 AM
тАО04-08-2007 07:43 AM
Re: Languages and SDLN
50 --> tea
60 --> coffee
:-)
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-08-2007 09:43 AM
тАО04-08-2007 09:43 AM
Re: Languages and SDLN
SDL and SDL/NOPARSE can both convert the SDI intermediate files into language-specific files. SDL can further convert source files into either SDI files or language-specific files. The intermediate files are what are used to populate STARLETSD.
The compilers then process the language-specific include files. Typically using standard means. (As Hein mentions, the other approach here is via the Oracle CDD Respository mechanisms. Many of the compilers included this, but AFAIK CDD was never used to generate the system symbols.)
So you're looking to go from the SDI files or the STARLETSD library or equivalent, into whatever the compiler expects to receive.
There's no callable SDL version, so that's a bit of coding work. Basically, this involves inserting the SDI processing into the compiler file input processing path, and having the SDI feed the language-specific source code back.
Sure. It's possible.
Assuming the request is scheduled and then -- at the earliest -- this is probably a couple of years out, with details depending on the release cycles for the particular compilers involved. That's a guess, and it places this out around V8.4, and possibly later, based on the OpenVMS roadmap and on what I've seen of typical compiler release cycles.
Lob a formal request at HP, if you want to see it. In the meantime, I'd reinstall the compilers after an upgrade, assuming I needed the updated or the new definitions.
Stephen Hoffman
HoffmanLabs
--
If I were feeling "sneaky", I'd look to either flag the STARLETSD changes after the upgrade and trigger a request for invocation of the compiler installations, or I'd look to drop off some sort of stub procedure that would extract and update the definitions when STARLETSD was changed. This avoids having to modify all the compilers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-08-2007 09:51 AM
тАО04-08-2007 09:51 AM