- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2006 08:15 PM
тАО01-15-2006 08:15 PM
Why mount the quorum disk ?
If I boot the first node, it starts the cluster as if the quorum disk is a voting member. However, I didn't mount the quorum disk. And when the cluster is up and running, the current votes is on 2 instead of 3 (ana/sys show cluster, the votes field).
It's logical that the cluster was formed when the quorum disk was seen by the first node because the mount of the quorum disk is done a lot later. But why isn't the vote counted in the voting schema ?
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2006 08:54 PM
тАО01-15-2006 08:54 PM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
Even not mounted, the quorum disk should give its vote : see
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/wizard/wiz_8592.html
So there must another prolem. Any Opcom messages ? What is the value of QF_VOTE in sh cluster/cont ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2006 09:10 PM
тАО01-15-2006 09:10 PM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
In operator.log I find "Please mount the quorum disk", thats all.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2006 09:15 PM
тАО01-15-2006 09:15 PM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
In the status I saw qf_active but not qf_watcher.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2006 09:22 PM
тАО01-15-2006 09:22 PM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-16-2006 12:39 AM
тАО01-16-2006 12:39 AM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
But in older versions of VMS, dismounting the quorum disk clears the valid bit for the unit, which makes a readpblk fail. (VOLINV).
Did you dismount the quorum disk ?
Or some event/error may have cleared the valid bit of the device.
( an SDA show device before the disk was mounted could give a hint)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-16-2006 01:05 AM
тАО01-16-2006 01:05 AM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
Small note : it's a cluster with 2 AS1000 with votes and access to disks running 7.2. In the same cluster we have 2 AS4100 running 6.21h3, these have no votes and no qdisk setup.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-16-2006 01:33 AM
тАО01-16-2006 01:33 AM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-16-2006 02:05 AM
тАО01-16-2006 02:05 AM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
I removed the mount of the quorum disk.
The cluster started without any problem and qf_votes is YES and votes is 3, so correct.
So, the mount is not needed to boot or to have the disk votes in the schema.
I rebooted the 4 nodes at once in my original case. I guess something went wrong.
But it IS solved by doing the mount (can prove it with console output).
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-17-2006 03:32 AM
тАО01-17-2006 03:32 AM
Re: Why mount the quorum disk ?
MVTIMEOUT 3600
SHADOW_MBR_TMO 120
The disks are connected to a dual controller that is in turn connected to the 2 voting systems. For the non-voting members, the disks are MSCP served. None of the systems is fully patched.
At 19:12:45 the cluster transition started
At 19:12:45 cluster transition completed
At 19:12:48 the first mount verification message was displayed
At 19:12:49 the message "xxx has been removed from VMScluster" was displayed
At 19:12:50 the first mount verification complete message was displayed
At 19:13:04 the cpu of xxx halted
At 19:15:35 a disk was thrown out of the shadow set
At 19:16:29 the just removed disk is mentioned to be offline and 1 second later it is AGAIN removed from the shadow set
My questions.
1) how long can a mount verification take ? And in this case, the task was dual : the remaining voting member must take control of all disks and it must serve them to the non-voting members. 120 seconds seems a long time for me.
2) how is it possible that the disk is removed 2 times ?
3) the 2nd disk removal is almost 220 seconds after the mount verification was started. Why is it permitted to do overtime (SHA...TMO is 120) ?
Wim