- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- mixed-version cluster
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2006 05:57 AM
01-23-2006 05:57 AM
mixed-version cluster
2 VAXes are running VMS 6.2.
2 Alphas are running VMS 7.3-1.
The customer wants to upgrade the Alphas from 7.3-1 to 7.3-2 using separate system disks, using the rolling upgrade, while the VAXes stay up (6.2).
If the upgrade "rolls" there would be a point where there would be 3 versions of VMS. I seem to have read somewhere where you cannot have more than 2 versions ever, even through rolling upgrades. Is this true?
thanks...
-Ron Maillet-
VMS Support
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2006 06:27 AM
01-23-2006 06:27 AM
Re: mixed-version cluster
since Vax versions are not always synchronous ty AXP versions, such 3-version situations are inevitable (there only exists Vax 7.3, no sub-versions).
That said, I have serious doubts about any 6.2 <-> 7.3(-x) combination, but you ARE already running that.
But, there is a _WIDE_ gray area between "supported" and "may work".
Since you already ARE running Vax6.2 plus Alpha7.3-x, there definitely is _NO_ code that forbids it.
So, your chances are good, but, _IF_ things go wrong, you ARE on your own!
Should you decide to do it, will you report back here?
Success!
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2006 05:04 PM
01-23-2006 05:04 PM
Re: mixed-version cluster
regards Kalle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2006 06:04 PM
01-23-2006 06:04 PM
Re: mixed-version cluster
I'm not sure of the combination VAX 6.2 and Alpha 7.3-2, but from my own experience the combination VAX 7.3, Alpha 7.3-2 (or 8.2) and IA64 8.2-1 hasn't given any trouble up till now. I wouldn't recommend it though in a production environment.
Greetz,
Kris (aka Qkcl)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2006 10:28 PM
01-23-2006 10:28 PM
Re: mixed-version cluster
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-24-2006 08:41 AM
01-24-2006 08:41 AM
Re: mixed-version cluster
We also have a mixed cluster- currently a 9 member cluster made up of a mix of VAX, Alpha and occasionally a I64 machines. We currently run VAX 7.3 with a mix of Alpha 7.3-1, 7.3-2 and now 8.2, and we occasionally bring in a VAX 6.2 or a I64. We have been running this type of configuration for many years with no problems. We are using it in a development/ test arrangement - not production.
Don Hill