- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: regarding tape backup
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2006 07:51 PM
тАО03-25-2006 07:51 PM
Re: regarding tape backup
Remember that BACKUP adds some overhead so the amount of data to be written to tape is more than the number of blocks in use. Also the figure of 320 assumes 2:1 compression which does not necessarily happen.
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2006 08:25 PM
тАО03-25-2006 08:25 PM
Re: regarding tape backup
at the risk of stating the obvious:
_HOW_ do you tell BACKUP that it may use the next tape?
The question for some action comes as a REQUEST with a number; answer it with
$ REPLY /TO=
It has always worked for us..
hth
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2006 08:45 PM
тАО03-25-2006 08:45 PM
Re: regarding tape backup
at the risk of stating the obvious:
_HOW_ do you tell BACKUP that it may use the next tape?
The question for some action comes as a REQUEST with a number; answer it with
$ REPLY /TO=
It has always worked for us..
hth
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-27-2006 11:53 PM
тАО03-27-2006 11:53 PM
Re: regarding tape backup
I think that the answer "NEW" could help too (as NEW_TAPE - second, not first).
You can prepare a second tape before this backup too (with the same label). And you'll happy with continue of backup.
Petr
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-28-2006 12:34 AM
тАО03-28-2006 12:34 AM
Re: regarding tape backup
1) new tapes : as selected on the drive
2) used tapes : as selected by the previous drive that used the tape.
So a tape used on a tz88 is used as a tz88 whatever the drive until it's initialized with INIT/DENS=DLT8000 (or whatever).
My advise : each tape used for your SDLT must be INIT with the highest density before any (re)usage.
BTW : do not forget /group=0/block=32|64K
BTW : I think compaction is enherited in the same way but can be overruled with /med=compact
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-28-2006 01:01 AM
тАО03-28-2006 01:01 AM
Re: regarding tape backup
if my memory is still good, /IGNORE=LABEL should overlay the label check. However this qualifier can be dangerous, because you could insert a wrong tape.
In my mind you can use REPLY/TO command whenever you need it.
Why you don't use /MEDIA=COMPACT qualifier to compress data?
Antonio
http://it.openvms.org
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »