- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- FTP throughput
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2003 12:14 PM
тАО05-07-2003 12:14 PM
Any help is appreciated
TIA
Ahmad Alghaden
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- ftp
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2003 08:11 PM
тАО05-07-2003 08:11 PM
SolutionMy first thought would be to try an isolate the problem a bit further. If you do ftp's of the file from the tru64 server to itself - does that performance compare to the Windows 2000 performance. This would isolate the problem local to the tru64 FTP Server. If the performance is OK there, then it could be the potential route/network/PC configuration of/to the Windows 2000 system.
Do "netstat -i" and check Ierrs & Oerrs on the tru64 side. Do they look clean while doing an FTP upload from the PC to the tru64 unix server?
What is the ping performance like in either direction?
Check the network routes from tru64 unix side (traceroute) and from Windows 2000 side (tracert). Could be different routes being taken.
Keep in mind to use the same identifier used for FTP, the ip name or the ip address in your ping and traceroute testing. Maybe DNS related.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dave Bechtold
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-07-2003 11:32 PM
тАО05-07-2003 11:32 PM
Re: FTP throughput
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2003 07:49 AM
тАО05-08-2003 07:49 AM
Re: FTP throughput
Today is the weekend in Saudi Arabia Thursday 06:30PM.
Only some users are login to my ES40 alpha server. I performed upload and download again and got the following results.
ftp> get full.dmp
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for full.dmp (10.1.32.35,1131) (12495093
76 bytes).
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 1249509376 bytes received in 136.67Seconds 9142.39Kbytes/sec.
ftp> put full.dmp
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for full.dmp (10.1.32.35,1134).
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 1249509376 bytes sent in 181.45Seconds 6886.13Kbytes/sec.
ftp>
As it show above the transfer rate for both upload and download is apprx 10MB/S.
But during job hours, I got good upload rate and bad download rate .
Any help plz
Ahmad Alghaden
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2003 11:17 AM
тАО05-08-2003 11:17 AM
Re: FTP throughput
Makes sense that performance is better while the network is not loaded. But, there is still approximately a 20% difference in performance from a download versus an upload. Does this ratio compare to what you see during a typical network load, during business hours ?
You only mentioned the upload performance (15Kbps) in your original posting.
Also, I'd still look at the netstat, ping and traceroute data while the issue is occurring.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dave Bechtold
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-10-2003 11:34 PM
тАО05-10-2003 11:34 PM
Re: FTP throughput
It is network problem .
I thought it is ftp daemon configuration problem
My case is solved right now .
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
C:\>tracert 128.128.100.1
Tracing route to 128.128.100.1 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.1.32.2
2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 128.128.100.1
Trace complete.
C:\>ping 128.128.100.1
Pinging 128.128.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 128.128.100.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=63
Reply from 128.128.100.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=63
Reply from 128.128.100.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=63
Reply from 128.128.100.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=63
Ping statistics for 128.128.100.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\>
moeduc1> ./traceroute 10.1.32.35
traceroute to 10.1.32.35 (10.1.32.35), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 128.128.81.200 (128.128.81.200) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
2 10.1.32.35 (10.1.32.35) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
moeduc1>
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-11-2003 06:31 AM
тАО05-11-2003 06:31 AM
Re: FTP throughput
I'm glad that information helped you solve the problem.
Take care,
Dave Bechtold