- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: DL385 Simplex / Duplex question
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1757411
Members
3242
Online
108860
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
The article you are trying to access is permanently deleted.
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-03-2005 08:56 PM
тАО11-03-2005 08:56 PM
DL385 Simplex / Duplex question
Hi
I have a DL385 with 2x72Gb in bays 1&2 as Array A (RAID-1) and 2 x 146Gb in bays 3&4 as Array B (RAID-1 also), using embedded SmartArray 6i (with battery option).
I have installed the Duplex SCSI terminator etc. The system is running fine. However, I wonder if I have done so in the optimum way...? At present, Array A has it's own SCSI channel, and Array B has it's own channel.
Would I be better (would it even work?) to have 1 of each drive in bays 1 & 2, and the other of each in bays 3 & 4, so that both both arrays share both channels? I can see that this may help in the event of a channel failure, and possibly performance may be better.
On the other hand I can see advantages in having a SCSI channel dedicated to each array...
Can you offer me any guidance?
Thanks
I have a DL385 with 2x72Gb in bays 1&2 as Array A (RAID-1) and 2 x 146Gb in bays 3&4 as Array B (RAID-1 also), using embedded SmartArray 6i (with battery option).
I have installed the Duplex SCSI terminator etc. The system is running fine. However, I wonder if I have done so in the optimum way...? At present, Array A has it's own SCSI channel, and Array B has it's own channel.
Would I be better (would it even work?) to have 1 of each drive in bays 1 & 2, and the other of each in bays 3 & 4, so that both both arrays share both channels? I can see that this may help in the event of a channel failure, and possibly performance may be better.
On the other hand I can see advantages in having a SCSI channel dedicated to each array...
Can you offer me any guidance?
Thanks
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2005 12:22 PM
тАО11-04-2005 12:22 PM
Re: DL385 Simplex / Duplex question
Clive:
Your current configuration is correct. You can make arrays only with disks on the same channel.
Your current configuration is correct. You can make arrays only with disks on the same channel.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2005 04:43 PM
тАО11-04-2005 04:43 PM
Re: DL385 Simplex / Duplex question
Not quite right - you can make array across channels as long all channels belong to same array controller.
For your Question if you can split for each array utilize both channels in case one channel fails, its extremely rare occasion when one channel fails, more likely you will get Array controller failure rather than one channel.
Present Configuration would be more beneficiary for you in case if in the future you run out of space and you can migrate from RAID 1 on the Channel 1 to RAID 5 with 3 or 4 drives.
Or move second Part of Duplex to the optional PCI Array controller.
For your Question if you can split for each array utilize both channels in case one channel fails, its extremely rare occasion when one channel fails, more likely you will get Array controller failure rather than one channel.
Present Configuration would be more beneficiary for you in case if in the future you run out of space and you can migrate from RAID 1 on the Channel 1 to RAID 5 with 3 or 4 drives.
Or move second Part of Duplex to the optional PCI Array controller.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2005 05:59 PM
тАО11-04-2005 05:59 PM
Re: DL385 Simplex / Duplex question
Thanks for both updates; I will leave as it is at present as it sounds more common.
I understand it's more likely to have complete controller failure than 1 channel failing.
Thanks also for noting the space availability with RAID-5 instead of RAID-1. However, it's not a problem at present. My server will be running SQL 2005 and I'd like to keep log and data files on different physical disks as well as having good write performance so I think RAID-1 is better for me at persent.
Regards
I understand it's more likely to have complete controller failure than 1 channel failing.
Thanks also for noting the space availability with RAID-5 instead of RAID-1. However, it's not a problem at present. My server will be running SQL 2005 and I'd like to keep log and data files on different physical disks as well as having good write performance so I think RAID-1 is better for me at persent.
Regards
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP