- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Basic 802.1q question
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753880
Members
7484
Online
108809
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2006 03:00 AM
тАО03-16-2006 03:00 AM
I was configuring these HP switches for the first time (i'm more familiar with cisco) and I was unclear about how to configure them as far as best practice goes for VLANing.
I have a 5300 with 3x2600 switches attached. From CLI, I have created 4 new vlans + the 1 st vlan.
The questiong is, this the best way, or should I have 1 vlan on the 5300, and then extend it to the 2600, and then create a new vlan on it?
Or should I create all the vlans on the 5300, and then create a second vlan on the remote switch?
Also, what should I do with vlan 1? have no ports in it?
Thanks for any help!
On a cisco switch I woudld have just trunked the ports and it would have taken care of the details.
I have a 5300 with 3x2600 switches attached. From CLI, I have created 4 new vlans + the 1 st vlan.
The questiong is, this the best way, or should I have 1 vlan on the 5300, and then extend it to the 2600, and then create a new vlan on it?
Or should I create all the vlans on the 5300, and then create a second vlan on the remote switch?
Also, what should I do with vlan 1? have no ports in it?
Thanks for any help!
On a cisco switch I woudld have just trunked the ports and it would have taken care of the details.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2006 03:25 AM
тАО03-16-2006 03:25 AM
Solution
Hello Charlie,
What Cisco calls VLAN trunking, Procurve calls VLAN tagging. It is not clear to me what it is, you precisely want to achieve.
Good practise is to leave VLAN_1 as it is, and create extra VLANs as you need them. You can have multiple statically defined VLANs travel over a single physical port (Tagging, Cisco speak; Trunking). The switch on the other side can be in GVRP mode and will pick up VLAN IDs (read the specific section about GVRP for the details on this). Personally I do not like GVRP, but this is just an opinion.
The best way to configure is as always; it depends :-)
What Cisco calls VLAN trunking, Procurve calls VLAN tagging. It is not clear to me what it is, you precisely want to achieve.
Good practise is to leave VLAN_1 as it is, and create extra VLANs as you need them. You can have multiple statically defined VLANs travel over a single physical port (Tagging, Cisco speak; Trunking). The switch on the other side can be in GVRP mode and will pick up VLAN IDs (read the specific section about GVRP for the details on this). Personally I do not like GVRP, but this is just an opinion.
The best way to configure is as always; it depends :-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2006 03:39 AM
тАО03-16-2006 03:39 AM
Re: Basic 802.1q question
Thanks for the response. I think a light went on before I submitted my last response.
To have the 5300 do the layer 3, I think i would need to define all of the vlans on it. If I left all the switches in the same common vlan on the 2600 uplink, and created a second vlan on the 2600's, than they would need to do layer 3 to get the data accross. From an early post I read about the limted mac table on the 2600's ,I will probably want to do all the routing on the 5300.
Does that compute? Thanks,C
To have the 5300 do the layer 3, I think i would need to define all of the vlans on it. If I left all the switches in the same common vlan on the 2600 uplink, and created a second vlan on the 2600's, than they would need to do layer 3 to get the data accross. From an early post I read about the limted mac table on the 2600's ,I will probably want to do all the routing on the 5300.
Does that compute? Thanks,C
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-16-2006 10:32 AM
тАО03-16-2006 10:32 AM
Re: Basic 802.1q question
Yep, it would be better to have only the 5300 performing the routing if possible. Create the necessary VLANs on both the 5300 and the 2600 and enable tagging for those VLANs on the port that interconnects them.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP