- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: Poor Gigabit Performance on 4108gl
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1756185
Members
2896
Online
108842
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-01-2006 02:03 PM
тАО10-01-2006 02:03 PM
Re: Poor Gigabit Performance on 4108gl
Does the 4108 do store-and-forward packet processing only, or is it capable of cut-through processing? Is it feasible that, if it only does store-and-forward, that's the root of the problem? Would a cut-through device make a difference here perhaps? Finally, do the new models do cut-through? (5406zl, 4208vl)
I'm looking at new switches so I'm reviving this thread. I want to make sure I don't have the same performance issues if I do replace the 4108.
I'm looking at new switches so I'm reviving this thread. I want to make sure I don't have the same performance issues if I do replace the 4108.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-01-2006 02:52 PM
тАО10-01-2006 02:52 PM
Re: Poor Gigabit Performance on 4108gl
As far as I know, all ProCurve switches are store and forward.
This is needed to check CRC's on packets, and is also required for multilayer operation (layer 2 & 3).
There's a good article about switching methods here:
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=357103&seqNum=4&rl=1
This is needed to check CRC's on packets, and is also required for multilayer operation (layer 2 & 3).
There's a good article about switching methods here:
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=357103&seqNum=4&rl=1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-02-2006 03:30 AM
тАО10-02-2006 03:30 AM
Re: Poor Gigabit Performance on 4108gl
Has HP abandoned Fast Path technology on the newer switches? In researching the 4100, it was apparent that HP was touting their Fast Path tecnology along with that model. I can't seem to find any references to Fast Path in regards to their newer chassis switches. Are they still using a similar architecture perhaps but just not giving it a fancy marketing name?
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP