- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- best device for core?
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753912
Members
8464
Online
108810
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-11-2008 06:09 PM
04-11-2008 06:09 PM
best device for core?
What device would you reccommend for the core of our network?
here is the setup.
three fiber links, 1GB speed each
two with 5308s on the other end, acting as a L3 switch. 1 with a L2 cisco switch on the other end.
each site has its own 10.x network
two fiber links, 1GB speed each
connects 17 buildings via AT&T network, each bldg having 100MB links
each site has its own 10.x network
each site has either a 5308 acting as a L3 switch, or a Cisco 1760 router
our WAN is provided by AT&T, and doesn't "appear" in the path of the traffic. we have the two 1GB fiber links into our NOC from the ATT central office, and then 100MB links to each building from the ATT central office. they pass all traffic as is from one side to the other.
currently, I am using a 5308 chassis for this.
I have a vlan setup for each buildings wlan link. 3 are directly connected to the 5308 as I said, and then eight thru one WAN link from ATT, the other eight thru the second WAN link from ATT.
I have servers and computers on this switch as well, on the vlan that the switch operates as the center of my network. This also is the route to our internet access.
Shuld I look at replacing the 5300 with something else, say 8200 or 9300, or something else.. or stick with the 5300.
Currently, we are experiencing some issues with network slowness to the internet that I have not been able to determine the cause. All buildings expereince this problem, and it does not appear when I connect to the network on the public side, after our firewall (PIX 515E). We also have slowness to resources located on servers on this switch.
switch module config
two 24port 10/100 modules
one 4port mini-gbic module, with three 1GB fiber mini-gics
one 16port 10/100/1000 module, with all ports full and the two mini-gbic 1GB fiber gbics for the ATT wan
one 16port 10/100/1000 module, unpopulated.
thanks for any advice/suggestions.
Matt Shuter
here is the setup.
three fiber links, 1GB speed each
two with 5308s on the other end, acting as a L3 switch. 1 with a L2 cisco switch on the other end.
each site has its own 10.x network
two fiber links, 1GB speed each
connects 17 buildings via AT&T network, each bldg having 100MB links
each site has its own 10.x network
each site has either a 5308 acting as a L3 switch, or a Cisco 1760 router
our WAN is provided by AT&T, and doesn't "appear" in the path of the traffic. we have the two 1GB fiber links into our NOC from the ATT central office, and then 100MB links to each building from the ATT central office. they pass all traffic as is from one side to the other.
currently, I am using a 5308 chassis for this.
I have a vlan setup for each buildings wlan link. 3 are directly connected to the 5308 as I said, and then eight thru one WAN link from ATT, the other eight thru the second WAN link from ATT.
I have servers and computers on this switch as well, on the vlan that the switch operates as the center of my network. This also is the route to our internet access.
Shuld I look at replacing the 5300 with something else, say 8200 or 9300, or something else.. or stick with the 5300.
Currently, we are experiencing some issues with network slowness to the internet that I have not been able to determine the cause. All buildings expereince this problem, and it does not appear when I connect to the network on the public side, after our firewall (PIX 515E). We also have slowness to resources located on servers on this switch.
switch module config
two 24port 10/100 modules
one 4port mini-gbic module, with three 1GB fiber mini-gics
one 16port 10/100/1000 module, with all ports full and the two mini-gbic 1GB fiber gbics for the ATT wan
one 16port 10/100/1000 module, unpopulated.
thanks for any advice/suggestions.
Matt Shuter
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-12-2008 05:34 AM
04-12-2008 05:34 AM
Re: best device for core?
I would go with the 8200 if you can afford it, if not then I'd look at the 5400.
I think the 5300 should be able to handle what you're doing, but I would be careful with the 16 port 10/100/1000 module as it is not always wirespeed to the backplace. If you can connect your firewall to a 4 port 100/1000-T module or even a 24 Port 10/100 module you may see better performance.
I think the 5300 should be able to handle what you're doing, but I would be careful with the 16 port 10/100/1000 module as it is not always wirespeed to the backplace. If you can connect your firewall to a 4 port 100/1000-T module or even a 24 Port 10/100 module you may see better performance.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP